Baron Samedi

[size=1]Charles has hit the nail on the head. Xander Harris isn't funny. Oh, wait, that wasn't it. Well, it was, but... Being an enjoyable person to be with is more important than whether or not you should hold her hand or french her. Physical comfortability will come with time. Just wait. You'll know.[/size]

[size=1]Don't ya know why? Because, the higher ranked you are, the cooler you must be. lol. And the opinions of people online are important.[/size]

[size=1]OB has no ads, and no linkage to offsite pages in source. Also, HTML and other code is disabled in signatures. I'd say you've been remotely hacked, or were doing something else at the time. Alternately, your scanner might have been scanning your computer and picked it up at the time.[/size]

[size=1]*realises what Sauce-Head's intials can be* Anyway, I was only defending his first post, because he was saying what I was saying. None of his other posts deserve defending.[/size]

[size=1]Don't you love humans? This kind of game makes me feel really proud to be one.[/size]

[size=1]A person can 'live' on rat-meat and dirty water. Therefore, they have the necessities to live. Anyway, this feels like a carbon-copy lash out at consumerism. There is amazing waste occurring in the world. If everyone on Earth used as much oil as the average American, supplies would be gone within a decade. Americans constitute 5% of the population, and 25% of oil consumption. Entire countries agriculture can be aimed at sating McDonalds cows. 10 calories of South African wheat make 1 calorie of beef, and the wastage of energy in that cycle costs $2 billion a year. Consumerism can be a monster. Which is why I said that management, not deprivation is the way to go. You think people can, and should give up their luxury, and get back to the bare necessities for survival. But why?[/size]

[size=1]So, Adahn, you're saying that a third-world child who is deliriously happy that he has found a rat for dinner [i]is not deprived[/i]?[/size]

[size=1]Let me put it this way. Would you be interested in entering a relationship with a sickly looking, fat, smelly person who only ate junk-food? I'm not saying that looking like a sex-god/dess is going to score you all the partners you want. How many bold tags do I have to use to convey the bloody message? I mean, come on, lol. It is simple. Looks are not everything, but nonetheless they are important. I don't know if it is American tradition to treat your body like crap, but you shouldn't. Health=Important.[/size]

[size=1]It is natural to seek ease. Why settle for less? To conserve resources. Fair enough. We should all live on farms, and provide for ourselves. Lets go back to the 1700's and enjoy a full day of hard labour, knowing that we are satisfied and contented with this difficult way of life. Resource management is the way to go, not deprivation.[/size]

[size=1][quote=Siren]Baron, I'm the antithesis of this formula, and just from how I project and carry myself, I get attention. There is no concrete, rigid, structured list of dating steps or guidelines. There just isn't, lol. If there were, only certain people would be dating certain people, all the time, and the "inferior" people would be dating "inferior" people, all the time. That's not the case, clearly, so clearly, the formula given in this thread is bunk, because it's trying to apply objective qualities to a situation that is clearly subjective. Furthermore, the objective qualities stated here, in the formula, are ultimately based on subjectivity, so their objectiveness comes into question, don't you agree?[/quote] Some more finely selected quotes for you. Or, actually, I'll repeat the quotes I used in my last post. *Hint* read the bolded bits. [quote name='Sauce-Head]To get girls, you have to have a [B]lot of factors[/B] working together for you. But the single area that you have the [B]most control over[/B] is your [B]appearance[/B'].[/quote] How can you say that staying clean, having a physique, dressing decently,and eating healthy are bad things? Appearance is not everything, [b]as I have emphasised[/b]. But, it is something. Get some pride, people.[/size]

[size=1]OMG, lol. Cinnamon signed up for OB! Anyway, I'm glad you like my splash page. A certain somone *c[B]a[/B]o[B]l[/B]u[B]a[/B]g[B]n[/B]h* thought I should get rid of it. But I'm happy with it. Yeah, browsing back through my pictures was a real nostalgia trip, lol. Thats partly why I have so many. Couldn't stand to leave any out.[/size]

[size=1]This is stupid. I doubt anyone here would actually shoot to kill someone else. Certainly not a bunch of depressed teenagers, who probably couldn't hold a damn gun.[/size]

[size=1]An iPod and a Lamborghini. But seriously, like thats going to happen. I'd be happy with new processors for my computer, more RAM and... some money to buy some more clothes. I'm easy to please. Donations should be sent by cheque and made out to my mother.[/size]

[size=1]Fido strongly suspected that Martha was bringing back a bone.[/size]

[size=1]So, many of you think this approach is rubbish? #1- Working out consistently might not be necessary, but keeping yourself in reasonable physical condition is good. Not only does it look better, it is better for you. Your body is a temple. Give it the best. #2- I don't see how you can argue against this. You don't have to wear expensive clothes, but you need to be aare of both what you wear, and how you wear it. #3- Once again, how can you argue against someone who keeps themselves clean? As I said before, your body is a temple. You need to treat it well. #4- Just yesterday, I was at a sleepover. We ate so much lollies and soft-drink. But, it is rare for me. I don't like having pimples all over my face, and clean skin is much better looking. Most of you people seem to be disagreeing with what he is saying. Let me select a few quotes from the first post in this thread. [quote name='Sauce-head]To get girls, you have to have a [b]lot of factors[/b] working together for you. But the single area that you have the [b']most control over is your appearance.[/b][/quote] [quote]If you put these four factors together, you should have a [b]higher self-esteem[/b]. This will [b]make you more confident[/b] which is [B]half the battle[/B] with the girls.[/quote][/size]

[size=1]Thanks. My archives button will have a calendar underneath, and link to my weblog archives, which are/will be under the 'Last Standing' link.[/size]

[size=1]Thats fair enough. I was being tongue in cheek, but not nastily ~_^ These people probably feel different. Maybe they'd rather keep to themselves, or maybe they [i]are[/i] snooty. But it is their choice. I don't always want to talk to people either. Maybe its my situation, but some of this seems amazing that it has to be taught, and some of it needless that it is being done. For instance, it may [i]have been[/i] polite to rise whenever a woman enters the room, but does it solve any purpose? No. Hats in restaurants are a definite no, but I'd say classrooms are acceptable. Holding doors open for people is something you just do, especially if you're a kid. At the least, as you're leaving, if someone is close behind you, you give it that extra push so that it stays open. And as for calling women hoes and bitches...what a bunch of wannabe thugs. In Australia, I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who genuinely talks like that, especially as many people would burst out laughing if some wannabe gun-slinger said that.[/size]

[size=1]Alan was really bugging me to get these screenshots up, so he could see my 'craptastic' site. So, here you all are. My site isn't finished yet, but I've shown what I have done. Especially you, you ingrate. Apologies for the low quality and awkward pasting. I was rushed, and wanted to show pages in a full screenshot.[/size]

[size=1]This has been my desktop since...well, a fair while.[/size]

[size=1]Oddly enough, I read a review for this on Pixelsurgeon just this very morning. It sure looks interesting. The glorious banner does it full justice. The one thing I don't like about it is the red edging...I think a thinner, sleeker design would have been good. But, your frame-cutting is very good. Didn't even take me too long to load on dialup ^_^[/size]

[size=1][quote name='Adahn']Every bit of matter/energy that exists today has existed for eternity in one form or another.[/quote] And my friend, thats where you are wrong. Wrong, wrong wrong. Delicious word is it not? In all physical instances, excepting nuclear, the conservation of matter and energy applies. We all know that 'matter nor energy cannot be created or destroyed'. However, that is one big crock of crap in regards to nuclear physics. When a small piece of matter is destroyed, energy is created. Bye bye matter, hello energy. And you're ignoring the other valid point that souls have absolutely no reason to obey the laws present in this plane of existence.[/size]

[size=1][quote name='Lady Rin']I does say something, it says that raising a child whether 1 or 100 is the responsibility of everyone who touchs that childs life, it works.[/quote] Yes. You're right. But, can anyone really disagree with that? I'd assume that most people would be aware of the effect society has on them. As such, I stick by my guns, because you're not really saying anything. On a side note, I'm [i]really[/i] impressed that you, singlehandedly, managed to turn your entire town around. [COLOR=White]Tongue in cheek.[/COLOR][/size]

[size=1]Is my idea viable or not, do you think? Because it would both solve the problem of thread size, and difficulty in finding threads.[/size]

[size=1][quote name='Zeta']I'm sorry I am not buying that. Every guy I know says that exact same thing, even I do, and when it all boils down to it we don't follow it. I myself would go around to all my friends and would say that looks don't matter to me as long as they have a great personality and what not, but ultimately it ends with me saying no because they aren't "hot" enough for me. Everyone says that and when it comes time for that to show, many don't follow what they say.[/quote] Well, thats your ******* problem, isn't it? I'm not saying I'll go for 'fat' girls. I will go for girls within an acceptable limit, because within that limit, girls can appeal to me. So, stop putting your personal template on everyone else, and move on.[/size]

[size=1]I still can't see that you're 'saying' anything. You can't disagree with your statement, because communities do affect how people grow up. They might not affect them in a good way, but it still affects them. Essentially, you're making a statement about how a phrase touched you. And thats nice, I have no problem with that. My point was that it didn't say anything. It doesn't have to either, mind you.[/size]