AutoKill

Geting mass tokens 1/1 creaters is all good fun. But a red deck would laugh in your face. The best way to actualy play mtg in my eyes, is to have a tournament with starter decks and 2 boosters. Then go from there.

The best decks are combo decks. If you cant kill in 6-8 rounds then your not going to win a tournament. I have a soilder white deck based on speed and damage with about 2 tricky combos. And i still cant get 1st in tournaments. :(

I hate to seem like the realist, but i think you should of known this would happen when you got together with a military man. So don't point your anger at the military.

Talking behind some ones back. Or "Back-stabbing" as am going to call it, is another form of a power struggle. The whole idea is childish. People still tend to us it when they get older. Weather the "back-stabber" knows it at all. They are usually just trying to put themselves in a position to were they better there popularity by trying to change some one else?s views. (Improving their rank by lowering someone else?s) You on the hand already know this. Am a type of person that fights fire with fire. So if you dislike it that much, I would go ahead and tell the person/or persons that do it, to stop. If they understanding, then it will work out. If they are not, then you can look forward to being back-stabbed. Usually this behavior wears off after high school. So hang in there. Talking behind some ones back. Or "Back-stabbing" as am going to call it, is another form of a power struggle. The whole idea is childish. People still tend to us it when they get older. Weather the "back-stabber" knows it at all. They are usually just trying to put themselves in a position to were they better there popularity by trying to change some one else?s views. (Improving their rank by lowering someone else?s) You on the hand already know this. Am a type of person that fights fire with fire. So if you dislike it that much, I would go ahead and tell the person/or persons that do it, to stop. If they understanding, then it will work out. If they are not, then you can look forward to being back-stabbed. Usually this behavior wears off after high school. So hang in there.

I have had a ceramic class for some time now. I had it in the start of 10th, and I will be in the class today around 2:30. I usually free hand. I have only worked with a wheel twice. I have found the class to be helpful to me as a "artist" to broaden my scoop of artistry. That and it completely blows math, English, and history out of the water. I haven?t thought much on why people today have such a fascination with the arts. I just hope more people make it a hobby.

[quote][i]Originally posted by Chaos[/i] [b]The entire world just needs to sit back, accept people for who they are, and shut the hell up.[/b][/quote] That?s the great thing about the Bill of rights. We don?t have to "sit down and shut the hell up.? Hell, if we all did that we would be another form of China... I understand your opinion. In mine cases people "over do it". Regardless we are basically a free nation. So I agree with you on that we shouldn?t be so stereotypical but at the same time we all should praise individuality to some degree.

[quote][i]Originally posted by James[/i] [b]Anyway, yeah...we basically agree. As far as your thoughts...well, when you are around women do you always think "Is she checking me out?" There is this feeling that gay men are sexual predators or are always interested in sex. *shrug* It's just another false stereotype.[/b][/quote] Males are thee aggressors in sexual encounters although. So i guess there is at some level to witch homosexual males may be more of the predators then heterosexual females. I do understand that in all actuality to label a group of people as something different is silly. But if it helps comfort people with homosexuality then I find it welcoming. I would hope to see less prejudice about these types of things.

[Quote][i]Transtic Nerve[/i] [b]I think we're doing just fine right now without that term. In fact I believe it might do more damage than good. But thats me.[/b][/quote] I think this still depends on the area you live. I live in a small town were mine things are rather taboo. I can safe say that homosexuality has a long way to go before every one is rather comfortable about it. There are mine people in my grade that show and say rather violent things about the gay community. Even if metrosexuality is a type of fad. I think it helps bring the homosexual community out of the minority group, and in a way helps people understand.

My scenes of smell isn?t very good. But i would have to say the smell of this strawberry shampoo is most excellent. It doesn?t actually smell like strawberries. But the generic type of sent they made is very good. (I don?t have the shampoo any more, and i don?t recall the name brand.) :(

Nothing better then a huge box... I have to say when you?re 6 or so. You?re just like a cat. Anything you can crawl in and feel like a spy is 100% cool. So yup.. Best toy when your a kid = a big box.

[b](EDIT)[/b][i]metrosexual South Park brings up good issues... So do you think metrosexual people are good for the gay community. And that it?s a way to lift prejudice off of homosexuals. Or do you think that its just a fad.[/i][b](EDIT)[/b] I wrote this on the fly. I really wanted it to be posted before I went to school. Very sorry that I failed to give a good explanation. [b]Metrosexual:[/b] (MET.roh.sek.shoo.ul) n. A dandyish narcissist in love with not only himself, but also his urban lifestyle; a straight man who is in touch with his feminine side. The reason why I mixed this into the gay community is the fact that most homosexual people often have the same characteristics as a metrosexual person. (Vise-versa)(Not all but most.) So that brings up mine topics, like.... Are metrosexual people just "posers". Or is it a new type of dressing fad. (I am referring to fashion and personality effects of metrosexuality.) Or do you think that the spread of metrosexuality is helping people better understand homosexuals. And if in a way metrosexuality helps lift prejudice off the gay community. 1) Is metrosexuality a type of fad? 2) Dose metrosexuality lift prejudice off the gay community? [i]Very sorry for the sloppy and ill-complete post.[/i]

South Park brings up good issues... So do you think metrosexual people are good for the gay community. And that its a way to lift predjudice from homosexuals. Or do you think that its just a fad.

My school at one time made us wear cool name tag badges with or pictures on them and stuff. So yah i think i toped you Transtic Nerve!...:confuse2:

I had a short childhood. I don?t think that it was a "bad thing". It just seems that in society, you have no purpose if you are not over the age of 21 and have a high school degree. Anyway, Childhood has very few ties with us when we get older. Some people feel that if you were emotionally harmed as a child. Your personality reflects that when you are older. I really think that age has nothing to do with it. I think it is the person?s strength of mind. (I luv to get off topic at the end) ;)

Get use to it. Its not that big of a deal. Some people dont cuss. Thats great.. When you get older teachers could care less about what you say. Welcome to the real world.

To Comment on James & PoisonTongue post, In or society we have a basic POV. Most peoples POV correlates with others. You have already pointed out that globaly pov's change dramatically. United States likes to think of it self as a global leader. It seems like we try to bridge the gap to other cultures and generally try to unit the world some how. This is all fine and dandy. Unfortunately for us there is not a book on uniting the world. So we are shooting blind. So yes, In every ones pov's every one can seem to be a monster. Not every one has to be exactly the same for society to work. We just need to be open minded about others, and their ideas on life.

If you don?t think humans are monsters, here is something I will let you ponder over. Off the cost of Cali. a boy gets eaten by a shark. Every one is sad. Swimmers and surfers alike are scared to go into the water. Local fishermen go out on their boats, and some how capture the shark that ate the little boy. They kill the shark and put it on display upside down on a chain so the people of the town can feel some what safe that the waters are safe again... When was the last time a animal has gone out of its way to get revenge. Really... The freaken shark was just trying to survive. And he successfully made a kill. And then we turn around and get our revenge. I can?t even think of a way we can justify that. So are human?s "monsters". I would have to say yes.

PhoenixFlame Am not a scientist. But s-cells work something like this. In a fetus the cells are not fully-grown. They have the basic structure of a cell. But they do not belong to anything. As the baby grows the cells form what they need to form origins and such. Scientist figured out by placing these undetermined cells with cells that already have became part of a structuer together. In doing this they found out that the undetermined cell (s-cells) creates whatever it seems to be around. So... your idea of taking a "middle aged cell" and replacing its guts with s-cell, would prove to be false by all my logical thinking. And you lost me on the whole energy part. Energy just means the ability to do work. It seems to me that you wanted to get to spiritual on it. And also? Baron is a cool guy, Don?t be mouthing off

[quote][i]Originally posted by Drix D'Zanth[/i][b]Then how do you justify it? I'd hope that you don't hold my own belief system against me when you don't have one yourself... I don't have a problem with being more careful, but I think so far we are doing a hell of a lot better than any unwritten rule would dictate.[/b][/quote] I don't try to justify it. If i feel something is wrong and un-moral to myself. Then i simply don?t do it. For instance, If i were playing some inter-net game. Say that this game is Starcraft (Broodwar) and there is a program that lets you cheat in a certain way, giving you an advantage. *cough*Maphack*cough*, I have the mind set that I would not want that advantage. So I wouldn?t get the hack. That?s how my "Belief system? works. I feel bad about killing off animals. Can i prevent harming other animals as a person, Yes. Can i help society from preventing harming animals, Possibly very little. So there really isn?t much i can justify. Then again if it came down to a deer, and me (and say this deer was the last one on the world) And we had to fight to the death to survive. I would do my hardest to kick that deer?s ***. But i still would have a hard time parting with it. [quote][i]Originally posted by Drix D'Zanth[/i][b]the coding? you mean {quote}{/quote} ("[" instead of "{"). Ouch. Yes, I know when I have to read through your rebuttle, I'm thinking "flattery" the entire time. It seems to me like you're flattering yourself.[/b] No not that. The last comment I made. [quote][i]Originally posted by AutoKill[/i] [b]Are you a idiot?... It is natures fault that or immune system is to weak to protect humans that live on a completely different continent???... I know you said your ?serious?... but I beg that you re-think what you have just said.[/b][/quote] You seem to make a effort by putting this cute guy. :laugh: I do value your opinions. Am no one to say that am completely right. But in society we have to make a decision on these types of things. And even if population control isn?t a factor. We still should have some type of idea on what we would do in that situation. Almost like a fire evacuation drill. :idea:

Drix D'Zanth, You seemed to mess up on a lot of your coding. :therock: Seems like we have came back to the same crossroad that we always do. You believe in god, and religion. So you think you are special above every other creature on the face of this earth. I am atheist. I believe that we are just another creature that is at the top of the food chain. Kind of like T-rex was during their era. We have once again met at this stop of indifference. First it was population control, then you made a very stupid post about how animal rights activist are stupid because some of them believe in the strongest survive. Then ultimately i bring up something about the mass killing of creatures on this earth, and once again you justify it by saying. Oh god made us the strongest so we could kill anything we want to. Sure it?s not what you said word for word. But that?s how am going to take what you said. And basically that?s what you said. That god gave us the honor of being the top of the food chain because we are the special creatures of earth. So I guess whatever makes you sleep at night.:sleepy: I know I am a hypocrite. I take advantage of being at the top of the food chain. But I don?t try to justify myself by saying god meant it to be so. I wish I could change society to become less harmful to the planet. Yes, less harmful. I don?t think we intentionally kill off animals and hurt the ecosystem. We do it by accident. I was trying to say we should be more careful. That?s just my opinion. I also saw that you didn?t say anything to my last post. You just quoted me and gave up. Am deeply disappointed.:bawl: I know I usually don?t try to quote you. It takes to much time to do the coding. And it really is only flattery. BUT.... I cant resists. :angry3: [quote][b][i]Originally posted by Drix D'Zanth Wait, they don't have opposable thumbs; no building guns or weapons of horrible destruction. So, I'm not going to hold that against the Lion. That would just be prejudice.. I'm not one to be prejudice, are you Autokill?[/b][/i][/quote] No. I am not prejudice. If anything am jealous. There are mine animals in the world that are fascinating to me. Please don?t imply something that rude to label me as.:cussing:

I am a male? Thank you... [quote][b][i]Originally posted by PoisonTongue[/b][/i] Shall I go on? I?ve probably got more, but eh. Feast on that.[/quote] Please dont. Stop you have confirmed to every one that your just another hypocrite. Don?t worry your not the only one out there. But you are probably one of the few ignorant hypocrites. [quote][b][i]Originally posted by PoisonTongue[/b][/i] I think she's(he) just an idiot. She(he) doesn't even know what the hell she(he?s) is saying, and frankly, she(he) can't even begin to debate with the heavy hitters here. The question to ask here, Sara, is not whether she(he) was serious; the question to ask here, is she(he) an idiot? The answer is yes.(your opionon)[/quote] How did you come to that assumption? That ?I don?t know what the hell am talking about.? I had a hard time understanding this. You say that, then you debate how we should thin out the world?s population. So even though am a idiot, you answer my question. I can understand that if you think my question is stupid, and then make fun of it by talking about ways to thin out the words population. While being sarcastic. But then your just making a *** out of yourself. I can only come to the fact that you?re an ignorant hypocrite. Or you made a really lame come back, to make me look as you put it a non-?heavy hitter". Even if being a heavy hitter makes you cool that is.

[Quote][i][b]Originally posted by Baron Samedilol.[/i][/b] You seriously thought that Drix was for real? Eh. There is no depth to your social perceptions, thats for sure.[/quote] :shifty:Yes... This is not my first time disagreeing with him on a post. And if i know him at all, i think he wants all of Africa to perish in nuclear fallout that kills off all "bad viruses" that can decrees the population of humans.:flaming:

Baron hit the nail on the head. (That?s a first) :blulaugh: The witch trials were a fraud. The people of Salem were puritans. Thrown out of England by King George. They were forced to go to what we call today United States. Here they practiced their religion in a town stead. To my understanding there wasn?t any type of police. And everything was settled by the ministry of the churches. (Here rises the problem) Some were in their bible it states. "Thou shale not tolerate a witch." I have no real clue what possibly caused the hangings of 12 people (am not positive but i think that?s how mine people were hanged) So i guess if i have to place a blame on the deaths of these people. I would say religion is to blame. :devil:

[quote][i][b]Originally posted by Drix D'Zanth[/i][/b] You know what's ironic? I belive that alot of the green-peacers are evolutionists right? Well, those that are, obviously belive in the "survival of the fittest." If that's so, why do they continually vie to protect endangered animals, obviously they aren't "fit" enough to survive anyway.[/quote] You have completely lost touch with nature. Survival of the fittest is animal vs animal, animal vs nature. Animals die in mass amounts due to pollution, and the destruction of their natural habitat. Not because we hunt all of the animals off the face of the earth. We are at the top of the food chain because of or "superior brain". But by all rights i think we have carelessly misused or power, like any other power hungry race. We still seem to think we are the all mighty creature on this earth and we must do everything to stay in the #1 spot. But the destruction of the ecosystem isn?t the best idea. So to shorten this up. Drix D'Zanth, you?re way out of line. Am hoping you had a blond moment when you made theses ignorant observations. [quote][i][b]Originally posted by Drix D'Zanth[/i][/b] We should nuke africa... it's given us Hanta, AIDS, Smallpox (it origionated in northern africa according to pathologists), and threatens to give the world a nice pandemic of Ebola, possibly. Oh yeah, I'm serious too...[/quote] Are you a idiot?... It is natures fault that or immune system is to weak to protect humans that live on a completely different continent???... I know you said your ?serious?... but I beg that you re-think what you have just said. Any way... To stay on topic. I still feel strongly about the fact that our world could possibly overpopulate. Am not saying that in the next 50 years we should make huge strides to stop this. But in 100 years a lot of things can change. A LOT?

I knew i couldn?t start this post without some things of South Park ending up in it. But Christopher Reeves should not be the target for your anger. Further more, i feel that even if some one tries to put bands on stem cell research, it will still be on going throughout the scientific world any way. So even if people feel it is wrong, it will happen regardless.