Violet Link

No, I ment FF3j on the NES. Look it up. You start out with 4 kids who all have a knife, clothes, and a leather helm. You collect points from battle and can use them to change your job. You get new jobs after you find a crystal. Kind of like FFV, but way better and longer. It was only released in Japan but I'm hoping they make it on GBA since I can't get a DS.

Technically, you could summon in FF3j by choosing the job caller. NEway, I think FF and FF3j were some of the best. I was really disappointed by nintendo when they tried to remake FF and FF2 because they were just sad. They made them way to easy. In FF, everything was cheaper and you had more money. In FF2, after 2 battles, you got your first weapon level up. Bad call nintendo, bad call.

Okay, I like SMB 3 because it gives me 6 hours of fun (i hate warping) and final fantasy because it's the only final fantasy game that actually gives me a challenge and it takes forever to level up. I didn't like SMB 2 because it didn't seem like a true mario game. I don't like mario games that don't have real powerups. Final Fantasy VI is cool because you can switch out your characters and don't have to use characters you don't like (most of the time) and the battles where you have your characters switch between groups (like w/ locke and the moogles) because you actuallly have to be smart about where you put your groups. I didn't like SMW 2 because like I stated before i don't like mario games w/o powerups like 'shrooms, fire flowers, etc.

[QUOTE=Shinmaru]I really would not have minded if Nintendo had kept the cel-shaded look for the next Zelda game, since I thought Wind Waker looked absolutely incredible, but this is a good change of pace. I still think it's lame that other people are "ecstatic" that this isn't another Wind Waker style game, but oh well lol. I can see where they're coming from, in terms of that style maybe getting old if it's reused, I suppose, but definitely not because it wasn't a good look for the series. In terms of voices, I agree with Charles; the supporting cast, I think, would be relatively easy to cast. I'm pretty sure most people's voices that they conjure up for Ganondorf sound relatively similar, as do their voices for Zelda and other characters. Link would be a bit harder to cast, I think, because people usually have their own distinct vision for a main character, at least in my experience. Keeping Link voiceless would probably be for the best. As for the gameplay, well, I'm sure that it will turn out excellent and we'll at least see something new like we have with each preceeding game in the series. EDIT: The video looked fantastic, as expected.[/QUOTE] I think the point of the cel-shading was to try a new approach towards the zelda games and show everyone that graphics don't matter that much, that it's really more about gameplay. But most people just care about the graphics for a game and think it will be awesome. But look at old NES games. They may not have the best graphics in the world, but they last forever (if you take good care of your NES).

[U]Favorite[/U] NES-A Tie Between Final Fantasy and Super Mario Bros. 3 SNES-Final Fantasy VI [U]Least Favorite[/U] NES-Super Mario Bros. 2 SNES-Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island ---------- How many swords could a sword-chuck chuck if a sword-chuck could chuck swords?