Liam
New Members-
Posts
38 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About Liam
- Birthday 06/25/1978
Contact Methods
-
AIM
LiamGFX
Liam's Achievements
New Member (1/6)
0
Reputation
-
Anime what is your favourite anime/manga movie?
Liam replied to studio_ghibli's topic in Otaku Central
I'm pretty fond of Zeram. It's the Aria Live action movie. It's a toss up with that and Casshern, the Kashan:Robot Hunter Live action movie. Possibly Even the First Battle Royale movie. I guess none of those qualify as anime movies but they're Anime/manga-based. -
Nice combo Arizen. It reminds me of tie-die meets worn denim meets old parchment :p The only real problem I have with the sig is that it's the exact same pictureas your Icon, granted it's in widescreen :P That and It feels a little boxy.:( Maybe if it was longer It'd feel more like a border. I wish they'd let us break up this 500x100 into maybe a 400x100 and a 100x100 or something to go side by side. :( The blue in the text is somewhat isolated, and the text in the icon is definately easier to read. 7.75/10 overall.
-
Bush alone? Half that information leading to WMD conclusions came from MI5.
-
When I graduated, I went to europe. I saw them in London. UNtill that day I'd always thought Dani Filth was the hot chick bathing in blood from the cover of their CD. Rude Awakening.
-
This truely is a brighter tomorrow, I present you with the penticle of modern construction!
-
Hmm... Maybe instead of worrying about how odd this is, you should instead be worying about how to kill the boar and properly dispose of the body???
-
I dunno.. I don't really have a favorite. That's kind of like asking me to pick my favorite kid(not that I have any) But for the most part I like Orange(because it's underused) and it reminds me of fall. I also like black, purple, blue, and olive or mint green.
-
9 times out of 10 it means the friend is intrested... Unless the friend of said girl who supposedably likes you really hates you, and then it could be a cruel joke. I guess it all boils down to how the "Pesterer" treats people. If she's genuinly good to her friends, then yeah, the party of the third part(also known as "the liker") probably has feelings for you, the "Likee"(or now known as the party fo the first part)
-
So what happened to rating the sig above you? Lol. Anyway after watching this thread for a week I didnally decided to take 5 minutes out of my busy schecule to make a quick Naruto banner. :P ANywho... On to Random.... I sure do love me some sepia tone. and I like the little fade marks in it. The text though blends a bit, and looks like it had no anti aliasing. The distortion(grainyness) in the pic is nice but the text is plain, and white no variation. Also as a genral rule of art the foreground(text in this case) should not be any brighter or darker than the backgroud. :( The image combos nice with whoever that guy is in your icon(not that I'm rating the Icon but it looks like it says "Handom". All in all 7/10. You get a C. :P Now vicious and unrulyness be unleashed upon me.
-
[B]Name:[/B] Mark Chaney [B]BattleTag:[/B] Umm... Mark Chaney? Although "Jinx" may be chanted often as an insult. [B]Age:[/B] 17 [B]Subtype:[/B] Human... Yeah Just human... a really unlucky one. [B]Strengths:[/B] He's a pretty average human, save for a pretty high pain tollerance, and a high imunity. He is however plagued with badluck, which is for the most part is the reason he has a high pain tollerance(due to NUMEROUS accidents, possibly severed nerves) and imunity (Untill the age of 13 he had a cold every 3 weeks) [B]Weaknesses:[/B] Well.. he is rather unlucky. [B]Powers:[/B] None known to him. He is however Pretty tough for a normal person.(No where near invulnerability) He has the ability to (atleast inspire sympathy if not) make up for lack of skill with good intent. [B]Personality: [/B]Mark can be a bit bipolar at times. Some times there are drastic moodswings torwards depression. They may be rare, but are severe. For the most part he's pretty outgoing and optimistic despite his unfortunatality(
-
[QUOTE=Rhym][FONT=Times New Roman] [IMG]http://www.iammol.com/recensioni/domine/dragonlord_2.jpg[/IMG] [/FONT][/COLOR][/QUOTE] Sure, everyone had heard of the knights of the round table, but at thanksgiving everyone in camalot paid praise to the Squires of the children's table.
-
[QUOTE=Kaise] 4:It's still the same ethical treatment when parents take money out of YOUR wallet. [/QUOTE] My Employer never put food in my mouth of a roof over my head. Do a compairison. Trust me....
-
Well apparently, My rock is alot closer to the facts than yours. I do not appriciate being flamed, Mother. As this is a somewhat Mature topic, let's try to keep the conversation such. as for support... Support for the invasion and occupation of Iraq included 49 nations, a group that was frequently referred to as the "coalition of the willing". These nations provided combat troops, support troops, and logistical support for the invasion. The nations contributing combat forces were, roughly: Total 300,884 - 98% US & UK United States (250,000 83%), United Kingdom (45,000 15%), South Korea (3,500 1.1%), Australia (2,000 0.6%), Denmark (200 0.06%), and Poland (184 0.06%). Ten other countries offered small numbers of non-combat forces, mostly either medical teams and specialists in decontamination. Before the attack, the head UN weapons inspector in Iraq, Hans Blix, clearly stated that his teams had been unable to find any evidence of nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons in Iraq. However, the discovery of illegal missiles discovered by United Nations weapons inspectors which were ultimately deemed in violation of United Nations Resolution 687 (1991), called the Al-Samoud IIs, raised serious questions: these rockets could possibly narrowly pass the allowed range of 150 km (93 miles), though without carrying any load. Ultimately though, they were determined to be in violation of the terms to which Saddam Hussein agreed in order to cease the hostilities of the Persian Gulf War and thus, deemed prohibited and ordered destroyed by the United Nations Security Council. In a May 26, 2004 Insurgents with a Sarin gas warhead used against US soldiers in an IED. The Boston Daily News published an article concerning this (poorly implemented) WMD attack against US troops by insurgents. This failed chemical weapons attack was also noted by The Associated Press and reported by Fox News later that year.[I] Read as violation of Cemical weapons and WMD treaties with Iraq.[/I] As of May 2005, small quantities of chemically degraded mustard gas had been found in old munitions. These are generally regarded as left-overs from the pre-sanction era before the 1991 Gulf War were not destroyed by the Iraqi regime.[I]Violation[/I] An article published by The Associated Press and reported by Fox News that more WMD not destroyed by the Iraqi Regime were discovered in South Central Iraq by Polish Allies. Sarin Gas warheads dating back to the last Iran-Iraq war were trying to be purchased by terrorists for $5000 a warhead. The Polish troops purchased items on June 23, 2004. [I]Again, Violation[/I] On August 14, 2005, The Washington Post published an article titled, Iraqi Chemical Stash Uncovered [62]. The presentation identifies a chemical weapons facility discovered in Iraq and chemical weapons uncovered were in the process of being classified. The time of instantiation was unknown. The article incorrectly indicated that Chemican Weapons was not used against allied forces in Iraq (ignoring the May 22, 2004 IED attack), ignores the July 2, 2004 discovery of Sarin Gas warheads and launchers by Polish Allies, and even contradicts the self-same article by indicating that chemical weapons were not found in Iraq. [I]supports above statements, proves media folley[/I] [B]UN Sanction violations.[/B] During the UN Sanctions, France and Russia had been selling and transporting advanced electronic military equipment to Iraq, violating international law. The discoveries reported on August 6, 2003 of MIG's with advanced electronics sold during the 1990's illustrate the difficulty in recovering evidence of UN sanction violations. Stated byy the UN Security Council Resolutions authorizing the 1991 invasion, in addition to Resolution 1441, gave legal authority to use "all necessary means," which is diplomatic code for going to war. This war ended with a cease fire instead of a permanent peace treaty. Their view was that Iraq had violated the terms of the cease-fire by breaching two key conditions and thus made the invasion of Iraq a legal continuation of the earlier war. Looks pretty cut and dry to me. I'm pretty sure you'll say that INSURGENTS are not offiliated with the legality of the war(and that is who we are currently warring with) However Insergents, and terrorist orginizations do not claim home soil and cannot be protected by any UN sanction. BTW LOL Drix.
-
[IMG]http://www.otakuboards.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=25089[/IMG] Erno stares into the crowd at the disembodied head of Dan Forden as it yells "TOASTY!" after Scorpion totally upercuts Tarja.