Transtic Nerve

Sometimes I can't understand why heterosexuals automatically associate the different sexual orientation with the act of having sex. As if anyone who goes and has sex with the same gender is automatically gay. This is not the case, I could point out millions of people who have had sex with the same gender and who remain heterosexual to this day. Just because they dabled into the unknown to them doesn't automatically make them part of it. Its like if you decide to go mountain climbing, does that automatically make you a climber now? Or if you dive off a diving board for the first time, does that automatically make you a diver? Of course not, so why would having sex witht he same gender automatically make you gay? It doesn't, so to answer the original question AGAIN, no, experimentation does not make you gay or bisexual, it simply is completely 100% NORMAL... and anyone who has never thought about it before is abnormal.... do you think gay people don't think about straight sex at least once in their life? lol. Its the same for both side, just one of those sides is to ashamed to admit it. I was reading this book once on adolescence... actually it was two books (written by a straight male doctor and a straight female doctor).... both of which had similar subjects within the books. Both books brought up the subject of same-sex experimentation. Both books said that experimentation with the same sex was a normal activity during adolescence. It's part of growing up. It's part of being curious. It's part of finding who you truely are. You can't find out who you really are until you find out what you're not.

no one knows anything about being gay/bi unless they are. It's not about sex, only an ignorant person would think sexual orientation is about sex... its about love. Everyone experiments... probably 50% of the boys here probably experimented...

Did he sayhe was gay or did he just say he had an affair with a man?

[quote name='James][color=#707875']Regarding Ju-On and The Grudge...The Grudge isn't a remake of Ju-On to my knowledge. The Grudge is just the western name for Ju-On. This movie has been available for a long time in Australia (I've seen it a couple of times). It's alright. Nowhere near as good as Ring. And in many respects, it tries to mimmick Ring...but fails. lol[/color][/quote] The Grudge is the Western Name for the movie, yes, but they made a US version starring Sarah Michelle Ghellar. There's a link to the trailer if you clikc on "The Grudge" movie title up there. Theres a link to all the trailers if you clikc on their movie title. I dunno if some of you missed that or not lol.

I'm curious to see what some of you think of some new movies coming out in the next 3 months. Heres a list and links to the trailers. Some of these I've been waiting for a long time, others I'm absolutely dying to see. [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/oceans_12/]Ocean's 12[/url] - Well the full cast from Ocean's 11 is back and with one more person. If it's anything like the original, which I'm sure it will be, it will be great. Release Date: December 10, 2004 [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/newline/cellular/]Cellular[/url] - This movie kinda looks like Panic Room in some weird sort of way. I'm interested in seeing it, but I can't say it'll be a great movie. Release Date: September 10, 2004 [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/resident_evil_apocalypse/]Resident Evil: Apapcalypse[/url] - This is a movie I've been waiting for since... well Christmas of last year when i first saw the teaser trailer. By the look of the actual trailer, this movie looks like it will be so much better than the first. The action sequences look coreographed better as well as the special effects. Release Date: Spetember 10, 2004 [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount_classics/mean_creek.html]Mean Creek[/url] - This is somewhat of an indepedant film. It has been int he Sundance film festival. This looks like a really in depth film. I'm into thrillers and horror films and this seems to be a good example of thriller. Release Date: August 20, 2004 [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/the_grudge/]The Grudge[/url] - This is yet another remake of a Japanese horror film made by the same people who made the Ring (does the girl look familiar?) Anyway, it looks like a GREAT film. I haven't seen the original but I am *cough*[SIZE=1][COLOR=White]downloading it[/COLOR][/SIZE]*cough* now... Ju-On the Japanese version has already been released as of July 23. Release Date for The Grudge is October 22, 2004. [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/team_america/]Team America: World Police[/url] - Fromt he creators of South Park, you know this movie will most certainly be funny... very funny. Its done with puppets and animation and uses the voices or imitated voices of many people. It looks really funny, but somehow I doubt alot of people will see it. Release Date: October, 2004 [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/suspect_zero/]Suspect Zero[/url] - A great thriller about a serial killer who kills other serial killers. It goes indepth about a special mind abaility people use to find other serial killers and some other stuff. Not quite, sure, see the trailer yourself to maybe understand it better. Looks really great and really in depth. Release Date: August 27, 2004. [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/lions_gate/saw/]Saw[/url] - A horror film which starts out making you think it's another Chainsaw Massacre, but it turns out to be something totally different, totall in depth, and totally worth seeing for sure. Release Date: Fall 2004 [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/lions_gate/open_water/]Open Water[/url] - People may say this looks boring but there's so much they can do witht he plot that it seems like it'll be a great movie to me. Release Date: August 20, 2004 [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/dreamworks/shark_tale/trailer/]Shark Tale[/url] - This just looks really funny. Like a Findign Nemo or Shrek kinda movie which were both really great so I have high hopes for this one. From the trailer it looks to be up there with those two films. Release Date: October 1, 2004 [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/touchstone/national_treasure/]National Treasure[/url] - The premise behind this movie is probably one of the most original I've heard of. It looks really good. Hpefully it lives up to its originality. Release Date: November 19, 2004 [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/independent/saints_and_soldiers.html]Saints and Soldiers[/url] - This is a new war film in the time of WWII and it looks a bit different than your typical war film, but it has many similarities. I love war films so I'm all about this one, as will several others here I'm sure. Release Date: Unknown [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/universal/meet_the_fockers/]Meet the Fockers[/url] - I know lots of people who have been waiting for this... since... well since forever. You won't be dissapoitned I'm sure. Release Date: December 22, 2004 [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony/touch_of_pink.html]Touch of Pink[/url] - This is a british film about two gay guys. I dunno if it was released there or not but it looks really funny. My kind of humour. It'll be a gay classic lol Release Date: Already out. [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/newline/blade_trinity/]Blade Trinity[/url] - Another movie I've been waiting for. this one looks so much better too. I thougt Blade II was better than the first and it looks like this one will surpass that as well. Release Date: December, 2004. [url=http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/the_forgotten/]The Forgotten[/url] - Another unique movie for the fall. About a woman who seemingly doesn't have what she did before and she must figure out how to get it back... Great premise and it looks like it'll be a really great film. Release Date: September 24, 2004. Thats it, there's a few other ones like Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow that I didn't mention because I really don't have any plans to see them or they just didn't appeal to me that much. Tell me what you think or add your own movie(s) you're dying to see and can't wait any longer for.

[quote name='Siren']This one sentence invalidates your entire argument of The Village being some deep and profound analysis of the human existence.[/quote] I don't know if you got me mixed up with someone else or you just didn't read my post, but I never said it had anything to do with being deep and profound analysis of our existence... In fact I said nothing to that extent at all, my whole post was pointing out that the people who feel "left out" because they thought this movie was going to be something that it wasn't are at fault by themselves, not by the movie. Like I said before, anyone who knows anything about Night's movies knows they are never what they seem to be, so it's not the movie's fault they wasted their money, they should have known better. Then I said that the movie is in depth. There was a post saying something about how this person felt the movie was just a flat work, when in reality, if they were paying attention, the movie goes into great depth. Not meaning it had any profound meaning, I never said that. I simply meant it explained everything that happened well enough to understand the movie. I dunno where in your head you got the silly idea that i was talking about soem analysis of our existence... thats your fault for thinking that. Perhaps you should read my post again. Tony, I'll agree. I wasn't much focusng on all that. I understand some people won't like it just because they won't, but I don't think the reasons like "the trailer mislead me" or "this isn't a horror flick" should be any sort of reason. Cause thats not what the movie is about, anyone who knows anything could have told you that. About Signs, I find Signs to be Night's worst movie in my book. I don't think it lived up to the other 3. It had no real surprised, it had no quick twist in the end... it was simply an alien flick. Which is something Night has been wanting to do since he was a kid. Also if anyone has the Signs DVD, they should check out Night's first alien movie and see the resemblence between the alien and the "monster" in The Village... Mitch... I don't even know what to say... How can you KNOW this film was made by Night and still even THINK that the trailer had ANYTHING to do with what was actually going to happen? Thats just stupid on your part. It's not being cheated out of anything, it's not false advertisement... it's the way Night has ALWAYS done his movies. Always, everyone of them has been the same way. Go watch the trailers for Sixth Sense and Unbreakable... Signs was a little different, but even then, go watch the trailer for Signs... you'll see.... I didn't say the movie was deep as in it had some big profound meaning, as I explained above. I said it was in depth. There's a difference perhaps in the two meanings. In depth means that it explains everything, that it makes you think, makes you figure things out, it put the audience into the film, insteadof just letting the film go on and on. I'll agree with you that Signs was not an in depth film... but Unbreakable and esspecially the Sixth Sense go far in depth. Why do you think the Sixth Sense is still ranked very high with movie goers as one of the best movies? Because it's in depth, a new experience for movie goers. Unbreakale is not known as well through most movie goers, partially because it didn't stand out alot compared to his other movies. Nothing really huge in it, but that doesn't mean it wasn't in depth. Any movie that takes you through the whole movie before you figure out what is really happens has alot of depth to it. Not saying it's gonna be the greatest movie ever, but you can't say it doesn't have depth. Let me just say one last thing. I'm not defending this movie on the basis of whether or not it was good or bad. Thats your choice, you make it, but I am defending this movie on the depth of characters and plot that it contains and on the way the movie was advertised. And if you were disappointed about this movie because you thought it was going to be about what the trailer presented it to be, then it's your fault for being disappointed. I would have been extremely surprised if it was exactly like the trailer made it out to be. But I knew it wasn't, because I know how Night does his movies. You should have known to before you went to see it. Because you didn't, you were ignorant to the whole movie and ofcourse you're not going to like it because you thought it was going to be some typical horror film. And yeah, I though Ivy's character was well acted as well.

Anybody who knows anything about M Night Shaymalan knows that each trailer he produces to each of his movies is not what the movie is about. The Sixth Sense trailer is about a boy who sees dead people... but the movie really isn't all about that in the end, it's about Bruce Willis's character figuring out he's really dead.... the Unbreakable trailer deals with what you think is a man who cannot get hurt no matter what... a miracle worker, but thats only a small element of the movie, it's really about Samuel L Jackson's character finding his opposite and essentially coming to peace with himself... completing himself... Signs... the trailer for signs mislead you to think it was about aliens and their crop signs, when in fact it was about signs from God. The reason the girl left the water around, the reason Merryle had his baseball bat up on the wall, the reason the boy had Asma (sp?)... the aliens attacking was part of the film, but the underlying meaning was not that. The village does the same thing. The trailers make you think that there are these monsters in the woods... when in fact, as you all know, it's something totally different. If you are upset because the trailers for this movie mislead you, then it's all your fault. You should have known from the start that this movie would have a surprise ending. That it would not be anything like the trailers suggest. Some of you are looking too deep into the movie, other aren't looking deep enough. [spoiler]It was Noah who planted the dead animal bodies. He was retarded, he didn't know any better for one, which would explain why the animals were skinned and not eaten or torn apart or anything. You'll also notice that when whats her face mentioned it to her father when he told her it was all fake, he seemed really surprised about it and honestly didn't know.[/spoiler] The movie was really indepth if you look passed your biased for it. If you actually listened to what the people in the movie said, put two and two together, you'll see that this movie was an indepth movie. Many of you missed it cause you were expecting a horror flick, which usually aren't in depth to begin with, and when you saw this and realized it's not that kinda of movie, you now had to make yourself see the depth in the movie, which you've already missed because you weren't paying that much attention in the first place. It's quite obvious why they are out in the middle of the woods, why they did it, who they are as people, and everything else. This movie explains everything, I don't have any idea how any of you missed all that information.... well yes I do, like I said, you were expecting a simple horror flick. So don't be dissapointed with the movie, be dissapointed with yourself for not being able to understand the movie. Night is not easily understood to begin with, but you can understand his weird motives. It all makes sense in the end. It always does.

[quote name='Semjaza Azazel']I'm probably going to see it Sunday. The one star review from Ebert doesn't leave me too optimistic though. I've not seem him speak that negatively of a film in quite some time.[/quote] I wouldn't expect him to like it. He's more old fashion as far as liking acting skills and a well written plot that doesn't twist around and do the things that Shaymalan's movies typically do. You have to like Shaymalan or not like him. He's more hit or miss than anything... I bet Roper liked it though...

I just saw the movie, and as far as that "ending" goes, the real ending has many similarities... It's an intersting, typical M. Night movie. When you think you've figured it out, he makes you think again, and then you realize, you already thought that this woul dbe the ending, but you never knew till the end. Get it? Spoiler of ending: [spoiler]When I was watching the movie, even the first scene, I thought right away that maybe the year on the tombstone wasn't the real date... but i shrugged it off as one of my many thoughts on the movie. As the movie progressed, I began to think, if this was actually happening in recent times, why the hell wouldn't they see planes flying over. That was revealed at the end. Then I also thought that the "creatures" were fake... made up by someone in the village, never really thought it was this huge secret. Anyway, the end was just as I had thought... this was all happening during recent time, but I never thought they did this all voluntarily.[/spoiler] Leave it up to M. Night Shaymalan to write such a complex and compelling story.

[QUOTE=Semjaza Azazel]You can't go completely by comics with any comic movie. They're adapted. If they stuck with just the comics instead of worrying about making a comprehendable movie, I think they'd have a problem making decent, succinct films heh. Same reason why they skipped over Gwen Stacy, I imagine... although I wish they hadn't. Anyway, here's Bale in the Batsuit for the new Batman film: [url]http://img70.exs.cx/img70/7304/bale.jpg[/url][/QUOTE] They skipped over Gwen Stacy because Tobey Maguire simply isn't that good of an actor to produce such emotions as having his lover die at the hands of his mortal enemy and himself really. Or well thats what I like to think anyway.... They simply put Mary Jane in the position of Gwen Stacy. Notice when Green Goblin drops her.... wow, doesn't that just sound so familiar. Except Spider-man saves her, unlike with Gwen Stacy.... Although the whole Gwen Stacy thing makes me sad to see and read, so I don't think it would have been really good to put in the movie, since obviously, from the way they made the second movie, that they don't take it that serious. Oh yeah, and here's the background on the Green Goblin, Hobgoblin, whatnot that I had typed up in the Spider-Man 2 thread: Norman Osborn played the first Green Goblin and Harry Osborn plays the second Green Goblin... there was actually 2 more Green Goblins (Dr. Barton Hamilton and Phil Urich). The Hobgoblin is actually a totally different story line as far as character is concerned. There have been 4 Hobgoblins in the history of Spider-Man. Roderick Kingsley was the first, followed by Arnold Donovan, Ned Leeds, Jason Macendale. Macendale was probably the more famous of the four battling it out with Spider-Man and Green Goblin II (Harry Osborn). Then you have Demogoblin which is the demon form of Hobgoblin IV essentially. Anyway, Batman looks like he gained 100 pounds for this role... I just shouldn't think about evil DC Characters... never a fan of any of them really....

[quote name='ScirosDarkblade']Eclipses are no faster than Celicas, and I can't say their build quality is better. I'd pick a Celica over an Eclipse for those reasons, although I think the Eclipse looks slightly cooler. There's also the Tiburon; nobody's mentioned that. It's under $20 and is pretty much in that same class of cars. Not quite as fast, but not quite as expensive.[/quote] Well in all fairness, thats because it's a Hyundai. I don't think any kid, no matter what the cost, wants to say "Hey I got a new car! Its a.... hyundai...." ANyway, you'd have to get a Tiberon thats atleast two years old. And the GT model. Those look the best, the newer ones are nasty. Anyway, About your Eclipse being slower than Celica.... it depends on two things, whos driving and how far your driving. The Eclipse has 2 cylinders less and much less weight, therefor it can jump up to 60 pretty fast, while the Eclipse has 2 extra cylinders and a bit more weight, it probably can't jump up to 60 as fast, but once it gets there, say goodbye to the Celica. 4-Bangers got the bang indeed, but they lack the longevity that V6s and 8s can run ya. If you went a quarter-mile, I honestly believe that between those two cars stock, it would be a toss up. Anything more than that, the Eclipse has it, anything less, the Celica. And yeah, you have to have a good driver too. And some more adviceon buying a car, stay away from Neons. I always laugh when I see some punk kid driving a sooped up Neon. Yeah it's all cool and not, but it's A FRIGGIN NEON!

[quote name='Shy][size=1']AWhat other female comic characters are there left to destroy? Perhaps she can take over the role of the Invisible Woman, or Lois Lane, or heck-- why not The Incredible Hulk? Halle Berry want larger role! Halle Berry Smash![/size][/quote] Ohh ohhh she can be She-Hulk! In the movie no one will ever see, Halle Berry is the green lawyer who can lift 30 cars, she is She Hulk! ::cue cheesy dramatic music:: Anyway... I think out of every role of the X-Men in the first two movies, Storm's was the least played out. Maybe Cyclops too. I think everone else had some sort of bigger involvment in the plot than Storm. But her character, by trait, is so suspicious and mysterious that there's not much to build character off of. Maybe if they gave her a little sub-plot beyond "searching for NightCrawler" then she'd be happy. I don't think Halle Berry is looking for a lead role in the X-Men film, that would ruin it, but I think she's just looking for an equal aprt to that of her cast members who all have some sort of sub-plot, either dealing with their past, present or future. Well at least thats what i think. Cause when I think of the first 2 X-Men films, Storms character doesn't even show up on the list of the characters that stood out to me. Not because of acting, but because of the way her character was written, with nothing interesting standing out in the film. Even Colosus stood out more than her. Which is sad cause he had a 2 minutes cameo and one line in the whole film.

I dunno how to react at this. Part of me is saying "thats kinda too weird to even believe, yet understand" and the other part of me is saying "This guy has got to be gay." No offense ofcourse, thats just what my reaction was. The girl grabbed your crotch and said she wanted you.... 99.9% of straight people would have been all over the opportunity.... what other possible reaction is there?

You can probably get a decent Mazda 6 for under 20. You may have to dabble in the 2002 or 2003 models. It's sporty, its 4 door so it'll cost less on your insurance, V-6 to your 4 cylinder in the Celica... it won't get as good gas milliage as the Celica, but you can't really expect it to. You can pretty much buy any Honda for under 20 grand. It depends on if you want to leave the car stock or mod it up. Its always cheaper to mod up Japanese cars, or crappy American cars like the Ford Escort. But if you wanna stay away from little crappy American cars (cause thats about all you'll get with 20) I suggest the Mazda 6, the Subaru WRX or Gti or whatever that Impreza model is, Celica is a good car, The Ralley Edition of the Lancer (although I don't recommend anything but the Evo for the Lancer)... or you can look for used cars and find yourself a really decent 1 or 2 year old car. You can ever buy yourself a new Mustang, although it'll be the low model end, or an older Camaro or Firebird. Lots of option, all depends on what you want or need in your car.

You could sue them for religious discrimination. But if you live in a right to work state, that would be a waste of your time. Regardless, personal matters, including religion, should not intertwined with your work matters. I don't bring my personal life into work, and I don't like it when other peopel do.

Um its a website. You can't turn it in. There is no web police shutting down "bad" sites. The only people that can terminate a website is the server. Besides that fact, the whole site looks like a big giant joke anyway, so you're probably over-reacting for no reason.

[quote name='Sir Auron']I believe that 'science', in trying to support and prove the belief in evolution, may have given proof that there is a divine origin.[/quote] Not to change the subject or whatnot, but I'm curious as to why you put the word science inclosed in quotes like that? Anyway, 'science' has proven evolution.... however, it's people who don't understand evolution that automatically assume that "evolution" means human evolution from ape, when in fact it doesn't. As we all know, that has yet to be proven. It's like James said, there's too much we don't know about evolution, genetics, whatnot. And because scientist don't know everything about it, it is all discounted as a simple myth or hypothesis. It's kinda sad really because there is no proof to this thing called religion either, yet there seems to be no debate in whether or not Jesus walked the earth or that God is real or whatever. I'm not trying to start a debate here, I'm simply trying to state my point as best I can. So yeah.

About a week ago, gas was $1.78/$1.79 or so... and that is low considering what we had a few months ago. But within that week it has shot up 10 cents. most places. Depending on where you go. If you go in high residential areas, its bound to be cheaper, but if you start heading out to downtown Orlando, you see the prices get higher and higher as you go. I was out past Orlando yesterday where the cheapest I could find was $1.91... costs me $30 to fill 15 and a half gallons.

Well in all fairness, all of these movies are up for grabs. Let me explain by telling you all the information you'll need on comic movies in the works. [b]Crappy-Movie 3/Spider-Man 3:[/b] I don't at all expect to see Venom or Carnage in Spider-Man 3. If anything, they'll do a Spider-Man 4 or even possibly Venom or Carnage's own side project film. What I expect to see in Spider-Man 3 are the possibility of 3 things, all having to do with Green Goblin. Green Goblin II (Harry) will be in the movie. They can't end the movie like they did and just not have him in there. But Since we already had a movie focused on the Green Goblin, this one will be more less focused solely on Harry and more on.... other people. My thoughts is that Harry will call upon other people to help kill Spider-Man. If you remember when Harry was gonna stab Spider-Man he jumped back when he saw it was Peter. I don't think Harry can kill Spider-Man despite his hatred for him. So what he'll do is clal upon others to do the work for him, and probably pay lots of money. These people include and are not limited to All membersof the Sinister Six, The Lizard, Kraven, The Rhino, and there is also a possibility of The Black Cat making some sort of appearance. I don't expect to see Venom or Carnage because their side story is simply too in depth to throw into this movie. Maybe maybe maybe as a teaser at the end of Spider-man 3 will you see some reference to Venom. Thats if they have any sense what-so-ever. But from the first two movies, any crap here is possible. [b]X-Men 3/X3:[/b] Here is the real tossup. Now you may not think so because of the ending to X2, but the script it yet to be written and so many ideas were tossed around, including one to not do the Dark Phoenix saga at all. That ocourse would make no sense, so my guess is that they will do a little on the Dark Phoenix saga. But I don't think they will push it too much and it'll probably come forth in the end of the movie somewhere. Also remember the actual saga that took place in the comics was around 35 issues. Theres no way you can fit that much information in one movie. There are alot of rumors going around abotu this movie. They talked about Sentinels making an appearance. A couple new characters including Jessica Simpson playing Dazzler. A Wolverine side story in his own film around the same time X3 is released. Iceman vs. Pyro. X3 and X4 to be filmed at the same time and released one after another. The Danger Room will make a strong apperance. Also Hugh Jackman has a 3 movie deal, Allan Cummings, Rebecca Romijn Stamos, James Marden are already signed with X3. Ian McKellen is likely to sign and Halle Berry might return as Strom. She said she would love to talk to producers about it. If shooting goes as planned to start Spring of 2005, expect the release date of X3 to be May 2nd 2006. At least thats the spot Fox already has written down. Of course with everything, that is subject to change. All of this is rumored material. Except for the ones who already signed on the movie and whatnot. Liek I said, I don't expect to see alot of Phoenix in this movie. I doubt the whole movie will be focused around Phoenix. It'll be focused on some other side stories and somewhere near the end, the Phoenix will make her arrival saving the day, etc etc etc. Expect it to be GOOD, Very Good. [b]Daredevil 2/Elektra[/b] Daredevil gave rise to the character Elektra and expect her to have her own film. Expect it to be released and to also coinside with Daredevil 2. If they make a Daredevil 2. If not, you'll probably see a cameo by Daredevil int he Elektra movie. I don't have much information about these movie plots. [b]Hulk/SMASH BAD MOVIE![/b] No. Hulk 2 won't happen. Why? Because the first one wasn't a big success. Maybe if it had been huge like Spider-Man, they would have. Plus there's not much character to the Hulk. He's just.... big, green, and ugly. Who wants to see that for an hour and a half. [b]Fantastic Four/F4[/b] Bet you didn't know they already made an F4 movie did ya? Well they did and it was so crappy it was never released, lucky for us you can probably find it downloadable on Kazaa or what not. I did, it really did suck.... his movie is already in semi-production. Ioan Gruffudd will be playing Reed Richards/Mr. Fatastic, Michael Chiklis as Ben Grimm (Thing) and Jessica Alba has been cast as the Sue Storm/Invisible Girl. Expect to also see Dr. Doom in the movie. F4 was marvel's first popular comic. It has a legacy to maintain and it will most likely be kept through film sometime here very soon. [b]Ghost Rider/Flaming Head Dude Who Rides Cool Motorcycle[/b] Talks have happened, locations being scouted, script somewhat done. This movie will happen. And it'll be badass as well. [b]Punisher/GUN? No Super Powers?[/b] Sequel has been scratched for the time being. Don't expect it any time soon, if ever. There's simply no money in a superhero movie with no super-powers. [b]Hellboy 2/HORNS! I WANT HORNS![/b] In the works. Filming should start in Summer 2005. Script not yet finished. [b]Iron Fist and Black Widow/whoopi, can't wait...[/b] Marvel has signed over movie making rights to Lion Gate for these two characters, but thats it so far. I dunno, Iron Fist and Black Widow are boring and if they go through, LGF will be out more money. Who knows. [b]Other Ideas[/b] Captain America: Here's an idea that may be played out. But here's a better idea. The Avengers. Cap was part of the Avengers, so why not make it 5 times better by throwing him in with Thor and Iron Man and everyone else. I think it'd make a much better movie than just boring Cap by himself. X-Force: Perhaps and Idea, although it may be playing too much off of X-Men for anyone to pay that much notice. They'll have to release it at a timely date. DC Comics: I hate DC comic characters. They are boring and don't dress well. So I really don't expect to see any movies out of them except the ones already being made (Batman, SuperMan, Catwoman) and Wonderwoman which is in the process of being made. Cameos: Ah, as we all know, or well, should know.... Comics are famous for having character cameos. Spider-Man, Daredevil, F4, X-Men, X-Force, Punisher... etc. They all have cameos to each other, why not throw this in the films! I think it's an absolutely great idea. The whole time watching Daredevil and The Punisher, I was just hoping to see Spidy comes flyin by a window or something. Something simple like that would be great! I think it would add alot to a movie if they would write cameos of comic characters into the script. Ofcourse, with the current movies, each marvel flick has been released under a different studio. X-Men - Fox, Spider-Man - Universal, Punisher - Lion Gate, Daredevil - Fox, Hulk - Universal And thats about all the news you'll find. Who feels like a geek now?

Well to put it in fewest words possible, looks like your f**ked. Just tell him your pregnant, he'll break up with you really fast and you won't have to hurt him at all. And then go sleep with his good friend. Anyway, seems to me like you have a lot of problems other than this boyfriend, girlfriend junk. Maybe you should sort out your own life before you go worrying about other's.

[QUOTE=NorykoAngelcry][SIZE=2][COLOR=darkred]And I'm going to re-ask my question: X2 Braveheart Troy It's an easy one! lol [/SIZE][/COLOR][/QUOTE] I meant to answer this before... but it's Brian Cox. Great actor... As for the latest, I can only think of Ving Rhames who was in Pulp Fiction and a voice in FF: SW, but I don't remember him in Billy Madison...

Yeah, Jack Black was in all three of those. And yeah, the answer to mine was Kiera Knightly... I dunno how you didn't know that if you put her as your own answer. Velvet Goldmine Black Hawk Down Down With Love

Tobey Maguire.... Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl Love Actually

They actually made movies about those crappy shows? I'd rather watch Spider-man 80 times before I see any of those.

One time, I went with my boyfriend to watch him play D&D, and i had to do something else. I was so bored.... It was slightly interesting in some weird way, but not really. Now the whole concept of D&D is cool. They use it in lots of games. But I culdn't actually play the game where I sit down and write on a paper imagining what I'm doing.