[quote name='The Professor' timestamp='1291413654' post='702355']
[font="Comic Sans MS"]This movie has been in development for a [i]very[/i] long time. It has been completely revamped several times, and each version was screened for test audiences. Yes, the final product is probably more action-oriented than the original concept, but it's also very reminiscent of the Silver Age of Disney. Just think of it as Cinderella or Sleeping Beauty, but with a bit of Aladdin thrown in to round out the target demographic.[/quote]
[font="Book Antiqua"][size="2"][color="#0000ff"]Although it does have the "Disney Classic" feel to it, I feel its truly a shame that [i]The Princess and the Frog[/i] became the last of the "hand-drawn" era. Especially since [i]The Princess and the Frog[/i] had a relatively obvious Neo-Disney component. I do agree that [i]Tangled[/i] was very reminiscent of the Disney of Olde, but I'm thoroughly disappointed that it was not chosen to bring to close one of the arguably greatest chapters in animation history. It had it all: the unlikely romance, the Disney-evil villain -often portrayed as a monarch-, amazing music, even the token animal counterpart for the protagonist.... But I digress.
You're right Ace, Disney is taking the proper steps to a sound generation of movies. But I wonder if it can hold. Disney has had a firm monopoly on making extremely old fairy-tales child friendly and entertaining for audiences of all ages and genders (my movie-going party consisted of three other late-teen gentlemen all of whom admitted to being near tears during the film). My only question is: what fairy-tales are left for Disney to recreate? Or will they simply start making them up from here?[/color][/size][/font][/font]