tigeroscar_1 Posted November 10, 2002 Share Posted November 10, 2002 is it better to have a big deck or small deck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted November 10, 2002 Share Posted November 10, 2002 I'd say small, because you have more of a chance of drawing the cards you need. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kinetic Posted November 10, 2002 Share Posted November 10, 2002 [color=darkblue] That's what I've always said, but a lot of my friends disagree. They think it's good to have a humongous deck with good cards, but that's not necessarily true, because you have a greater chance of [i]not[/i] getting the card you need. Me, I've always have an extremely small deck, but have gone up to 54, and probably won't go up any further. [/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigeroscar_1 Posted November 10, 2002 Author Share Posted November 10, 2002 well i have about 63 cards. 33 monster and 30 magic/trap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted November 10, 2002 Share Posted November 10, 2002 I have 50, lol. I refuse to go above, and to stop myself, I spend all my money on booster packs so I don't buy more card protectors. My deck is Spellcaster/Fiend Powerup/Beatdown I'd say. ;) Not sure if it classifies as beatdown though, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shy Posted November 10, 2002 Share Posted November 10, 2002 [size=1]This sort of thing is what the advice thread is made for. Topic closed. -Shy[/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts