Genkai Posted February 10, 2003 Share Posted February 10, 2003 I'm sure you all know about the new R/F list:I. Forbidden Cards You CANNOT use any of the following cards in the Deck or Side Deck: No restrictions, to be announced. II. Limited Cards You can ONLY use one of the following cards in the Deck & Side Deck combined: Exodia the Forbidden One Left Leg of the Forbidden One Left Arm of the Forbidden One Right Leg of the Forbidden One Right Arm of the Forbidden One Pot of Greed Change of Heart Dark Hole Raigeki Monster Reborn Mirror Force Delinquent Duo Confiscation Painful Choice The Forceful Sentry Snatch Steal Cyber Jar Upstart Goblin Swords of Revealing Light Card Destruction Witch of the Black Forest Imperial Order Jinzo Ceasefire Premature Burial Call Of The Haunted Morphing Jar Limiter Removal III. Semi-Limited Cards You can ONLY use two of the following cards in the Deck & Side Deck combined: Sangan Heavy Storm Nobleman of Crossout Backup Soldier Morphing Jar #2 I'm angry about the changing of SORL from Semi-Limited to Limited. My 2 SORL were a HUGE part of my deck.. Boo... Anyway, opinions? I don't really know what else they changed, actually, I didn't really look that close, that's all I really thought about :bluesweat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posthumous Posted February 11, 2003 Share Posted February 11, 2003 [b]NOOOO!!!!!! WOBF is still restricted to one per deck. They need to change it! *goes off to cry in a dark corner*[/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genkai Posted February 12, 2003 Author Share Posted February 12, 2003 Hmm.. it [b]would[/b] be nice to see WOBF on the semi-limited list! wish they wouldn't change things from one to the other though, that they should only add cards... I need to use both my SORL cards! Boo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hikaru Ichijyo Posted February 12, 2003 Share Posted February 12, 2003 I'm not too surpised they limited those cards, after all most of them are really annoying and abused too much unless you have Jinzo and Royal Decree on the field. Also I've seen on various cases people abusing certain cards to get exodia out by stocking their deck with three swords of revealing light, and pot's of greed. Overall I'm for those revision though even if they weren't made it would of been easy to deal with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumper Posted February 12, 2003 Share Posted February 12, 2003 For a restricted card list it is not too bad, I think the semi list its a precursor to been moved to the restricted list, i.e of the card is still over powered and too annoying it is moved up the list as it were (SORL a good example) Ya know what is really funny being a british player, there is no actual restricted list yet so i can play really stoopid decks hehehehe not that i bother anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Circ Posted February 12, 2003 Share Posted February 12, 2003 New certain restrictions are: Restricted to 1: Mage Power United We Stand Magic Cylinder Harpie's Feather Duster Possibly: Heavy Storm Semi-restricted: Gracefull Charity I'm not sure about Sinister Serpent, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted February 16, 2003 Share Posted February 16, 2003 [size=1][color=blue] I still agree that they need to change WOBF to two per deck, instead of 1. It would help me out a lot and I would maybe be able to beat my next door neighbor.[/size][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iggy Posted February 16, 2003 Share Posted February 16, 2003 Im with you on that I would have another cool stratergie if they could let you have 2 withces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted February 16, 2003 Share Posted February 16, 2003 [size=1][color=blue] Maybe we should protest for them to allow 2 Witched instead of 1. No, that's going a little too far. Maybe someone who worked for them visits the board as a guest and goes upon this thread. Who knows?? Only the future can tell...[/size][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyper Posted February 16, 2003 Share Posted February 16, 2003 They only go Japanese restrictions, when the time comes. For instance shortly after the english release of 304: Guardian Force, Sangan will be restricted to one too. When our card pools match, the restriction list will be the same. We might be able to do something, but it isn't UD's choice as to what gets restricted and whatnot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexus_storm Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 hey ppl, i have just got one part of the forbidden (the left leg) and i did have SORL until i lost it in a duel to my most noble friend whom at first would not take it but hes welcome to it, ANY way..my opinion on the forbidden list...well i think its actually pretty cool....the fact that it makes the duel or match so much more interesting and honourable and more to skill then power housing your deck. any way thats me done Nexus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solo Tremaine Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 Hey, Nexus. Good to see you. Enjoy your stay ;) I agree with your point about making it more interesting and honourable. For example, I wouldn't have two SORL anyway, because it just seems wrong, in my opinion. After all, you could stop them from doing anything for six whole turns while you built up a massive combo attack which wipes them out in one move, which I personally find rather dishonourable. It's like having someone held by the arms while you get ready for a big punch. At least with one SORL you get to hold them back for just a little bit, and I think that's fair enough. After all, the course of a duel can be changed by the draw of one card. And anyway, what I find most exciting about a game is getting out of tight spots. Although it must be a shame if you'd already worked up a combo around something that's now limited to one. I can't really see why Witch of the Black Forest was reduced to one... well... I can, actually. Summoned Skull has a Defence of less than 1500, for example. He could be brought round easily enough. And I don't think shuffling your deck more than so many times in one Duel is very helpful anyway. [SIZE=1]No hard feelings, Nexus. It was good fun. And there's always the chance to win it back.[/SIZE] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Circ Posted February 17, 2003 Share Posted February 17, 2003 :rolleyes: People, WOTBF was restricted because of Jinzo, which is a terribly powerfull card. Maybe not nearly as much as Cyber Stein, but a very nasty one at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gouf Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 look we all new it was to good to be true when UD had them on the semi. any how my discard deck got messed up because of the card desections became limted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexus_storm Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 , hey again ppl. with reference to the forbidden list i think that certain signiture cards should be limited to one per deck, like the dark magician and gaia and wing weaver and summon skull. I find it a lot more interesting playing like that and yes it makes it an even duel / match. It's all down to whether you want to play to win or play for the thrill...i find no thrill in enteruing a duel where i know im going to lose. and no im not refering to just your deck solo, im just saying, power cards should be limited. With honour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Circ Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 actually, I like the idea of not having more than 1 of ANY card with the exception of field magic cards, because that would introduce a much more interesting level of strategy in deck building. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexus_storm Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 its not just the deck building strategy...its the way you will have to play with out it..instead of waiting to double team your oponent..you've got to work with what you have got and i do have to say, if i did get another gaia, another wing weaver and another dark magician in booster packs...i would not place them in my dueling deck. Any one got an opinion on that one ?, am i crazy or just stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solo Tremaine Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 Neither crazy nor stupid, I'd guess- it's up to you how you build your deck. If your theme calls for another card like that then there's no reason why you shouldn't put it in, although high-level ones like that would need monsters to be able to tribute for them. That is, unless you play by Duellist Kingdom rules, in which case you don't need to worry about tributing. I think I'd be inclined to agree about the not having more than one of any card except field magic cards but, as has been mentioned already, sometimes having two of the same card can be vital for a combination or strategy, e.g. trying to summon the Blue Eyes Ultimate Dragon or the Twin Headed Thunder Dragon. Those combos and cards would be irrelevant then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gouf Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 i don't like loseing but a gaia limted i laugh at that. The restrictions list is fine considering the card the U.S. has its fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexus_storm Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 hmmm, in rare occasions i can see it being vital to have such numbers of cards, i suppose its how you want to go about getting the end result. i call to question no ones honour, for i have the utmost respect for every one, just take a moment to think about it all. Im curious now, what card does the U.S have that makes it fine ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now