BabyGirl Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 [color=deeppink][b]If there were only women living on the earth, do you think we'd still have wars?[/b] My friend and I were discussing this yesterday, and came to some really fun (if not strange) conclusions. I'd like to see what everyone else believes...all opinions are welcome ;)[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krillen Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 Hahaha, I think that there would be many many MANY wars! All the wars ive been in have been started by girls. (Wars in meens of arguments.) So yes I thinkt hat there would be Wars. There would be girls in Europe and girls in Asia fighting over continents yelling things like,"Hey! France is my *****!"(Hehe...Pardon my french, I meen, hehe, get it?) And stuff like that! But if there were just men, then there would be wars also, so either way there will always be arguments. Well thats my theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Char! Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 [color=teal][size=1]How absurd. If there were only women around then there'd be no reproducing, and the human race wouldn't have lasted more than 80 years. Simple as that.[/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omar Harris Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Char! [/i] [B][color=teal][size=1]How absurd. If there were only women around then there'd be no reproducing, and the human race wouldn't have lasted more than 80 years. Simple as that.[/color][/size] [/B][/QUOTE] Maybe women would be asexual. Anyway if ther e were only women then yes there would still be wars. Women mature faster than men so there would be less wars since they would obviously have a least a little more sense to solve conflicts peacefully, but women can be just as violent as men. And notice that women have a harder time getting over things. As the old saying goes "Hell hath no fury like a woman's scorn". Once a woman hates you it is tough to change her mind so violent conflict might go on longer than if men started them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabyGirl Posted July 22, 2002 Author Share Posted July 22, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Char! [/i] [B][color=teal][size=1]How absurd. If there were only women around then there'd be no reproducing, and the human race wouldn't have lasted more than 80 years. Simple as that.[/color][/size] [/B][/QUOTE] [color=deeppink]That is not the point. Pretend that women would be asexual, as shadowdramon said.[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Char! Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 [color=teal][size=1]But if they were asexual, then you couldn't really call 'em by a certain gender, right?[/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 Char, you're missing the point. I know you know what she's talking about, so shut up and go along with the topic. Yes, there would still be war. But I think there would be more assasination that war. We all know if you put a bunch of women together, there will be tension. ^_^ -Justin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Char! Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 [color=teal][size=1]But Justin, why should I "go along with it" when it is in fact a ridiculous question that denies the laws of nature? Now, if the question were more along the lines of [i]this:[/i][/color][/size] [QUOTE][i]Could have been posted by BabyGirl [/i] [B][color=deeppink]If everyone thought and acted like women, do you think we'd still have wars? [/color] [/B][/QUOTE] [color=teal][size=1]Then yeah, I'd answer that. But it's not, and because of the wording it's absurd. As I said, simple as that. --Mike[/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkM Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 To me that would be pointless... The world would only last for...around 80-85 years or mabye a little longer. So to me that makes no since to me at all! But .... back to the real point now. Well there would be no wars. And everyone would were all the same clothes so people wouldn't be made fun of...(boys + skechers=hahahaha)LOL) Ya the world might have been for the better... But its not gunna happen... Its kinda fun to think about also. But the same thing could be that the whole world could be Males...then things would be differend for the females which gose to show that both genders were put on earth for a purpus! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 Again, imagine that the women are all asexual, meaning they can reproduce on their own. Now, what do you think about the question? -Justin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 There'd be a whole lot of Slumber parties. And eventually, everyone would just walk around naked. And I would be at peace. As for the Wars thing... Yeah, it's in the nature of Human kind to destroy ourselves... One gender or another... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Char! Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Justin [/i] [B]Again, imagine that the women are all asexual, meaning they can reproduce on their own. Now, what do you think about the question? -Justin [/B][/QUOTE] [color=teal][size=1]Justin, did you forget?[/color][/size] [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Char! [/i] [B][color=teal][size=1]But if they were asexual, then you couldn't really call 'em by a certain gender, right?[/color][/size] [/B][/QUOTE] [color=teal][size=1]I think the question is null. No offense. --Mike[/color][/size] [size=1][color=red]If you can't participate in a small, fun topic, then, by all means, get out of it. Don't ruin it for everyone else who [i]has[/i] a sense of fun. -Justin[/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Anakin Solo Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 I think there'd be wars still. Most likely it would be like how the world is today. One country could hate another country for some reason, and end up going to war. Just because it's all women doesn't mean that there is finally peace all 'round. It's almost like saying what if the President was a women(I heard this at my school). A few of my girl-friends are like, "Yeah, if the president was a women we wouldnt have all these problems in the Mid-East and stuff." I was like and Why is that? So I went into a whole thing saying about why a women would still be just as good/bad as a male president. They dropped that theory right away, lol. Anywho, yes there would still be wars, in some form or another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shy Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 [color=darkblue][size=1]I dunno, women always seem to get into an argument over [i]something[/i]. Women also tend to hold a lot of resentment towards one another, like I have some female friends who still yell at me for things I did in 4th grade.[/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sara Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 We'd have wars for different reasons--and of different kinds. I'm gonna use my high school as an example here. Two guys get in a fight, sooner or later there's going to be a fistfight. [Hopefully it never goes further than that.] And then it's over. Two girls get into a disagreement--and wow, you'd better pray you don't end up in the middle of that. Nasty words, clawing, shoving, dirty looks, betrayal, half the school hates you--and of course, it goes both ways. And it doesn't even have to be a major thing--show up wearing the same shirt as someone else, and there'll be sparks flying. I've seen year-long fights going on between two [for lack of a better word] clans of girls over the stupidest things..... So it depends on how you define 'war.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Anakin Solo Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 Lol, clawing I got a kick out of that. You make a good point Cera..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omar Harris Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 As I have said before, if women were the only species there would be less war but the wars would last much longer than they did in current history simply because women hold grudges longer than men. But one thing I always questioned (just to slightly steer off topic) would there still be weapons of mass destruction (A-Bomb, tanks, guns, cannons) in this all woman world? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heaven's Cloud Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 [color=indigo]Of course there wouldn't be wars...because this is what the dialoge between countries would be like. America: Did you see the way Asia was wearing her hair...she looked like such a little tramp England: God I hate Asia...her hair looks so horrible, and those dresses that she wears don't even fit... [i]Asia Walks in...[/i] America and England: High Asia!! You look so pretty today, we love your hair! Asia: Thanks guys, you are so nice... [i]America leaves[/i] Asia: God, I hate that stupid little America, she thinks she is everyones best friend. England: She can be nice sometimes...not like that moron France... See, no wars, all the countries would just talk about each other behind thier backs[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mist Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 [color=red][size=1] *raises hand* If there were only women living on earth, I [b]know[/b] there'd be wars, but not between races. I think it'd be the the feminists vs. the ditzes. ^ _ ^;; Of course, there's those who could stay neutral...wait no guys, forgot that part...Scratch that thought, we'd [i]all[/i] be fighting. T.T[/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zidane11 Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 No, because the population would die because of not being able to reproduce. If that didn't happen then there would be wars with no men to say that you can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabyGirl Posted July 22, 2002 Author Share Posted July 22, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by zidane11 [/i] [B]No, because the population would die because of not being able to reproduce. If that didn't happen then there would be wars with no men to say that you can't. [/B][/QUOTE] [color=deeppink]:therock: You lost me.[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zidane11 Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 Most men would say it's not right for women to fight in wars. A women can't have kids without a man so the population would eventually die out. Is that any clearer? LoL [color=deeppink][size=1]Read this thread carefully...you'll find the answer to the reproduction dilema. -BG[/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mist Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by zidane11 [/i] [B] If that didn't happen then there would be wars with no men to say that you can't. [/B][/QUOTE] [color=red][size=1]My, my, don't we have a one track mind? Of course there could be wars without men! It could be a little less physical, more like a nuclear war, or it could be even more brutal combat. Just because we don't have guys in wars doesn't mean that there could never be a war. *EDIT* If you had read the whole thread, we were pretending that women were asexual.[/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Transtic Nerve Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 Yes, but they would involve perfume and shampoo not guns and missles... lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baby Kiwi Posted July 22, 2002 Share Posted July 22, 2002 [color=crimson]:mad: No one is getting this topic! Bah! It was such a good conversation too! What BG and I were talking about was that "What if women, who are asexual, (even if they are asexual we're still calling them women!) were the only gender on the world, would there be wars?" My answer would be no, there would be no wars. BG brought up the point that women do not have the same desire as men do to hold power. The only reason for war is that one party wants domination over the other party. Men have been in domination ever since the beginning of the human race. (There have been some exceptions to this though, but dominating women are not very common.) If you look back in history at all the wars, they are caused mainly by disputes of power. One race, nation, or culture wants to dominate another. Usually these have been ruled by men. That is why I think that there would be no war. Women do not want power the same way that men do. They do not solve things by violence either, they usually compromise and talk with whomever they are disputing with. (I'm sorry if you disagree with me, I am only expressing BG's and my opinion)[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now