Justin Posted July 23, 2002 Share Posted July 23, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Char! [/i] [B] [color=teal][size=1]Hey, I didn't want to start anything here. But why not throw a few twists in? I just wanted to make sure of all the facts and stuff.[/color][/size][/b][/quote] The thing is, we solved your problem and you continued to call it absurd. You went into overkill. Anyway, by human nature there would still be war...but who would be there to keep the football industry alive? And the sexy male model industry? And the rodeo industry? :( -Justin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkey Posted July 23, 2002 Share Posted July 23, 2002 A real Planet of the Babes? That would make for some interesting movies!:naughty: I can already imagine how they would interrogate soldiers: [QUOTE]Torturer- Where is your base, *****? Soldier- I'll never tell! Torturer- Alright, then! Guards, bring in the Shikima![/QUOTE] Bonus points for whoever identifies what the hell is a Shikima. Also, expect to see new types of bombs, like the Depends bomb, and monthly raids. And, of course, Lifetime would be the only channel available. (Don't take any part of this post seriously, except the "movie" part) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Posted July 23, 2002 Share Posted July 23, 2002 Women and men do not have their own unique natures. Human nature is human nature, thus the world would remain largely the same. Females tend to act differently than men because society has programmed them to act a certain way. Social Darwinism (essentially survival of the fittest) would still influence the way the world operated. Those in power would want to remain in power, thus struggles for power would still occur. Plus, religion and racism would still exist, so we would still have disagreements and wars over such issues. People are just inherently violent by nature. If we assumed that there would be no wars, we would automatically be theorizing that there would be no murder or assault. If anyone has bothered to read my words, then congratulations, you have just been enlightened. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathKnight Posted July 23, 2002 Share Posted July 23, 2002 [color=crimson]I think wars would be more Tatical and well planned, where no mistakes would occur. I'm not a woman, but I feel that women plan things better, and think it through more. Men can be quite rash, and if you anger them they make bad decisons fast sometimes. I guess it could be the same with women, but not as much. War would be more of a dance then a fight, strikeing where it hurts most, and more of 'who is smarter' than 'who has the brute strength'. I think nations in general would be larger, and hold together better. Instead of the dozens of small minute nations, like after the fall of the USSR, I think we would have several select larger countries, with a dozen moderately sized countries here and there. Peace would be more often, because I think women talking with other women would be more peaceful, and thought out. Male hormones wouldnt get in the way, Lol. But once and awhile, over a major disagreement, a peaceful end might not occur. You never know. In religon, I think it would be much the same really. Instead of appocalyptic ends, I think it might be a more peaceful, paradasic like ending for the world, where all evil is abolished and etc. Instead of all of us dieing in a bloody battle between God and Satan. Would Satan even exist? Prolly. I dunno really. Too many factors are involved with this whole thing. The social structure like in school and etc would be vastly different. Cliques I think would maybe be more widespread, but that is a personal opinon. Once again, factors are involved really. How important IS a guy in a clique? Do the guys tend to bring cliques together more? Without guys, would cliques be more fractured and small? Or would there be several large cliques, dislikeing the others? Who knows. The industrial structure would be more efficent, I think. A smaller, highly efficent industury, more 'quality' than 'quantity' factorys. Since there would be more peace, science could make great leaps and bounds in the peace time, when all resources could be focused on science, instead of war. Thats just a few things I think would happen, not that I'm right...[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted July 23, 2002 Share Posted July 23, 2002 Everything in the world would be settled with a nice little chat over a cup of tea.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mist Posted July 24, 2002 Share Posted July 24, 2002 [color=red][size=1] I hate tea...[/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turkey Posted July 24, 2002 Share Posted July 24, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Mist [/i] [B][color=red][size=1] I hate tea...[/color][/size] [/B][/QUOTE] In cases like this, Pepsi will do. Or beer. Or cofee... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Macaiodh Posted July 24, 2002 Share Posted July 24, 2002 [color=darkblue]there probably wouldn't be as much physical violence, but there's be MUCH more senseless, catty, jealous, back-stabbing, petty bickering. heheh, women don't destroy your body, they destroy your EGO. [/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mist Posted July 24, 2002 Share Posted July 24, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Lady Macaiodh [/i] [B][color=darkblue] heheh, women don't destroy your body, they destroy your EGO. [/color] [/B][/QUOTE] [color=crimson][size=1] So true, so true...[/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mnemolth Posted July 25, 2002 Share Posted July 25, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Sephiroth [/i] [B]Everything in the world would be settled with a nice little chat over a cup of tea.... [/B][/QUOTE] Talking never solves anything, it only postpones the inevitable. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eleanor Posted July 25, 2002 Share Posted July 25, 2002 [QUOTE]I think wars would be more Tatical and well planned, where no mistakes would occur. I'm not a woman, but I feel that women plan things better, and think it through more. Men can be quite rash, and if you anger them they make bad decisons fast sometimes. [/QUOTE] Hm, well it's a proven fact that most men are smarter than girls....but I guess men can REALLY stupid sometimes. *looks around school to see guys walking into lockers and drooling* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mist Posted July 25, 2002 Share Posted July 25, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by anime_gurl [/i] [B] Hm, well it's a proven fact that most men are smarter than girls.... [/B][/QUOTE] [color=red][size=1] I'm not trying to sound feminist here, I'm aiming for practical. I would really like to see the proof of that statement. [/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juu Posted July 25, 2002 Share Posted July 25, 2002 [color=deeppink] [size=1]strange.... I thought it was the other way around..... *shrugs and walks off*[/color] [/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mist Posted July 25, 2002 Share Posted July 25, 2002 [color=red][size=1] I was pretty sure to. I remember seeing a show about it on the news. *shrugs* Well, if they are, so be it. But down in the South, the chicks are the ones who have control. :D[/color][/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegeta rocker Posted July 25, 2002 Share Posted July 25, 2002 i think we would have even more then the guys do! If you think about it girls are more spiteful and vengeful when they are angered. We hold grudges, its like when girls gossip about each other and then turn around and go shopping with the same girl they dissed, don't even get me started on territory if you think guys are bad man you haven't seen anything yet. We may mature faster but that gives us even more time to think about fighting! as far as intelligence goes, think of it this way. They say guys are smarter than girls right? I don't mean to offend guys in any way but if you think about it they are kind of like dogs when it comes to learning, they are eager to show off their intelligence and do all the tricks in front of their master for approval. girls on the other hand are like cats, they are just as smart just not as showy, the dogs might have the upper hand in learning tricks, but have you ever seen a dog chase a bird? The dog barks like crazy and ends up losing it. But a cat stalks up silently and catches it. And girls play hard to get like cats do, a cat makes you work for its affection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Posted July 25, 2002 Share Posted July 25, 2002 I think as far as wars being more tactical, it realy doesn't matter what gender it is, there will always be a few great strategic minds. Women just haven't had much of a chnace to prove their capabilties as war-time generals. I wonder how different the world would be if Rome had never improvised the phalanx. There's a thought that's a little off-topic, lol. I think things would overly the same in all-female world. There would just be a lot less testosterone floating around. -Justin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sara Posted July 25, 2002 Share Posted July 25, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by anime_gurl [/i] [B] Hm, well it's a proven fact that most men are smarter than girls...[/B][/QUOTE] :therock: I suppose you could also say most women are smarter than boys... if only because of the implied age difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conpiracymonki Posted July 25, 2002 Share Posted July 25, 2002 [QUOTE][i]BG[/i] [B] [color=deeppink] Though I [i]have[/i] read quite a few posts that say that the wars would be of the backstabbing sort...because all women are petty with their arguments against one another? Isn't that making a rather large assumption about women? [/color] [/B][/QUOTE] [b][size=1]But..isn't making this thread in the first place making a rather large assumption about men?[/b] I think there would still be wars, and most likely, they'd probably still be the same. For every man of a type, I'm sure there's a woman out there exactly the same, and vice versa. It's just that they never seem to show up. If blah-blah guy didn't make the A-Bomb, I'm sure some woman would have sooner or later[/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxie Faye Posted July 28, 2002 Share Posted July 28, 2002 [color=indigo]Interesting question. I'm not really sure about my answer, to tell you the truth. I think, like... if there was a conflict between countries, there would be more talking about things first, rather than jsut diving into war. I think a lot of things would get done quicker, because we're less lazy, and, I think we're more concerned about things. I might be glad if the entire world had only women, because it would take away a lot of sexist discrimination. I mean, ya, there woud still be some rasciasm, but I think there would be less than there is know, because if sexism fell, than I BELIEVE(I have no proof of this, it's an opinion dammit) rascism would be less, too. Maybe then I'd finally get the respect I deserve for being an asian female *grumbles*. Could anyone dechipher that paragraph, aside from the last sentence? The one puzzling mystery that will never be understood by me, is why men have, in ancient time(and modern, as well), been considered more important than women, when women are the ones who are producing all life, including males. Grrrrrrrr.[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest agent_OBFS Posted July 29, 2002 Share Posted July 29, 2002 in ancient times the men were the ones who hunted (not in all cultures but most) and protected the village from hostile cultures. And then alexander the great showed up with a huge boner and destroyed everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted July 29, 2002 Share Posted July 29, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by roxieortatiana [/i] [B][color=indigo] The one puzzling mystery that will never be understood by me, is why men have, in ancient time(and modern, as well), been considered more important than women, when women are the ones who are producing all life, including males. Grrrrrrrr.[/color] [/B][/QUOTE] [color=royalblue]That's interesting... In actual fact, [i]all[/i] human babies start out female. They simply require a certain chromosome at the right developmental stage to make them male. Therefore, males are [i]technically[/i] an offshoot of the female gender. Given that females also have longer life expectancy and are often more physically tolerable of disease...I think it's pretty easy to see that for the human race at least, females are actually the core gender (so males are actually a product of females and not the other way around...which kind of contradicts the Adam and Eve mythology). I find it funny that even though the female gender is the core of human existence...men have always dominated. Hopefully in the future, things will be a lot more equal (though things are certainly improving at the moment, anyway).[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted July 29, 2002 Share Posted July 29, 2002 [size=1] *Reads the posts* Hmm. Yes there are some good things if woman were the only ones on this world, and bad things. Think about it. Wouldn't it be horrible for every woman. 1.) No sex (unless..nevermind)(That also goes if boys were the only ones.) 2.) No babies lol which means when everyone dies that is it.(Same with boys.) 3.) Driving and traffic would be way more dangerous.Hehehehe.(Nope. Doesn't go with boys...) There I conclude we couldn't live without the opposite sex. It would be way to difficult. No girls!!Bad thought! Anyway, who wants to live without the opposite sex??(Think about the cons, girls.;))[/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabyGirl Posted July 29, 2002 Author Share Posted July 29, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by \¤~NoodleZ~¤/ [/i] [B][size=1] *Reads the posts* 2.) No babies lol which means when everyone dies that is it.(Same with boys.)[/size] [/B][/QUOTE] [color=deeppink]If you HAD read all of the posts, you'd see that both asexuality and artificial insemination were discussed. Or at least I think the second one was...but either way, we'd find a way to reproduce.[/color] [quote][b][size=1]3.) Driving and traffic would be way more dangerous.Hehehehe.(Nope. Doesn't go with boys...)[/size] [/B][/QUOTE] [color=deeppink]::slap:: Watch your mouth :smirk:[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted July 29, 2002 Share Posted July 29, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by BabyGirl [/i] [color=deeppink]If you HAD read all of the posts, you'd see that both asexuality and artificial insemination were discussed. Or at least I think the second one was...but either way, we'd find a way to reproduce.[/color][/quote] [size=1] I should of specified. I only read the postes on this page. Sorry, so sue me.[/size] [quote][i]Originally posted by Babygirl [/i] [color=deeppink]::slap:: Watch your mouth :smirk:[/color] [/QUOTE] [size=1] Hehehehehehe. I knew that one would get you mad lol!:D [/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabyGirl Posted July 29, 2002 Author Share Posted July 29, 2002 [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by \¤~NoodleZ~¤/ [/i] [B] [size=1] Hehehehehehe. I knew that one would get you mad lol!:D [/size] [/B][/QUOTE] [color=deeppink]Heh, only partially. I don't consider myself to be in the same group as the mini-van driving mothers who go 69MPH on the highway [i]just to be safe[/i] (the speed limit is 70 in Michigan). I consider myself a dangerous driver in the fact that I'm far too speedy and extremely agressive. My driving habits more resemble those of a race car driver than a bad woman driver. Therefore, I am only partially offended since I don't consider myself dangerous in the stereotypical female way ^_^[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now