If there were only women in this world...

[Mist]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Baby Kiwi [/i]
[B][color=crimson] Women do not want power the same way that men do.
[/color] [/B][/QUOTE]

[color=red][size=1]Who says? A lot of women want power, and through the ages, have had power. How do you know what kind of power all women want? You can't really speak for all of us chicks; just yourself and those you know. I think it is quite possible for women to want power the same way men do.


Also, talking about how ALL women solve their problems was just a bunch of steroe-typing. Men also talk and try to comprimise too.

Anyway, just my opinion; don't shoot me.

(If you're thinking I'm a feminist, you're darn right I am. :D)

[/color][/size]

[PiroMunkie]

[color=indigo]Meh, perhaps a better solution to the reproduction dilemma is that women eradicated men from this planet and they merely use, and clone, the semen from sperm banks where female scientists tamper with the chromosomes to make sure only an X chromosome is sent over. That defies no laws of nature what-so-ever. :p

Anyway, sure there'd be wars. Just different kinds of war. I mean, like Cera said, if two guys were to get in a fight, first words would be exchanged, then fists after that. Maybe later that year those two guys would resolve their differences and maybe not be friends, but more like aquaintances who trust each other to some extent, but check with others to make sure theother guy isn't going behind the other's back (like the U.S.A. and Russia).

Girls on the other hand.. Nothing but spite for another female if one should even so much give another a weird look. They'll use oral warfare by spreading rumors, gossip, and secrets. Phsyical warfare by way of clawing, pulling hair, etc. And the worst of all, a type of warfare both women and men use, Chemical warfare. Girls don't use nuclear radiation and such things though. They'll use perfume, body lotion, moisturizer, hair spray.. you name it! And when used in combination with other chemicals this can become very deadly. One might suffocate in the pleasant fumes of Raspberry Peaches, while the chemicals penetrate their soft, moist skin that smells of Lilac. I think we're just lucky with all these spiteful acts women will do, most don't have the physical strength to back them up, which is probably why they resort to such atrocities to begin with.

A fearful thoughts indeed.[/color]

[Semjaza]

Hasn't anyone heard of the Amazons? The world would probably be exactly the same and just as violent.

[BabyGirl]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Mist [/i]
[B][color=red][size=1]Who says? A lot of women want power, and through the ages, have had power. How do you know what kind of power women want. You can't really speak for all of us chicks. I think it is quite possible for women to want power the same way men do.[/quote][/color][/size][/b]

[color=deeppink]Perhaps then you can you explain the reason we have yet to have a female president?[/color]

[B][color=red][size=1][quote](If you're thinking I'm a feminist, you're darn right I am. :D)[/color][/size] [/B][/QUOTE]

[color=deeppink]That, ma'am, is obvious ^_~ Just don't let feminism carry you [i]too[/i] far...people get really annoyed by it :cross:[/color]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by PiroMunkie [/i]
[B][color=indigo]Meh, perhaps a better solution to the reproduction dilemma is that women eradicated men from this planet and they merely use, and clone, the semen from sperm banks where female scientists tamper with the chromosomes to make sure only an X chromosome is sent over. That defies no laws of nature what-so-ever. :p[/color] [/B][/QUOTE]

[color=deeppink]Actually, Kiwi and I discussed that very possibility :p[/color]

[Mist]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by BabyGirl [/i]


[color=deeppink][b]Perhaps then you can you explain the reason we have yet to have a female president?[/color][/quote][/b]

[color=red][size=1] Sure. There have been women who ran for presidency in the past. Some have failed, and some haven't. There may have not been a female president in America, but there have been plenty female leaders of other countries. :p[/color][/size]



[b][quote][color=deeppink]That, ma'am, is obvious ^_~ Just don't let feminism carry you [i]too[/i] far...people get really annoyed by it :cross:[/color][/quote][/b]

[color=red][size=1] And you know what's funny? I figured that out the hard way...:toothy: But it's okay, because now I only have small spurts of feminism, as such.[/color][/size]

[Sara]

I get what you're saying, Kiwi. ;)

I agree that the wars probably wouldn't be about power--they'd be about revenge, and spite, and plain ole' hate. I'm not saying we don't have wars about those things right now, mind--but there'd be a lot more of them if the world were controlled by--quote, unquote--the gentler sex.

And it is a good conversation to have--I've had it with some of my buddies before, and I've seen it once or twice in forums. It's always better IRL, because you get dynamic discussion, instead of people trying to be brief and stand firm in their first post.

And a lot of women [i]do[/i] want power--and weild it well, in a quieter sense. You ever see a guy acting like a little lapdog at his girlfriend's feet? :smirk: You don't have to make headlines to be in charge or something--or someone.

I also believe that if there's a position of power open, someone is going to fill it. And someone else is going to want it. And now, instead of all-out power wars, we get the nasty backbiting high school girl girl scenario again.

Of course, if the only people left on earth were like [i]me[/i], the world would be perfect.

[Omar Harris]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by BabyGirl [/i]
[B][/color][/size][/b]

[color=deeppink]Perhaps then you can you explain the reason we have yet to have a female president?[/color][/QUOTE]

It has little to do with women wanting the power and more to do with society letting them have the power. We haven't had a female president for the same reason we don't have an Oriental, or Hispanic, or African American in office. Society wants to stick to what they consider the norm, which for Americans means a Caucasian male. But women could claim the power if they wanted to. Who do you really think wears the pants in the Clinton household? Obviously not Bill as we saw with the Lewinski controversy.

Women are just as capable of doing the things men are capable of. They can be lawyers, doctors, rulers, and even soldiers. There would still be war since humans, men or women, are imperfect and are prone to do foolish things even fight each other. I think there would be more backstabbing. This is a gradual thing (arguments, to treachery, to backstabbing, to gaining allegiances, to actual fighting). I mean look at how fast a man's decision (GWB) brought conflict between America and Afghanistan in the wake of 9/11. But for women, the conflicts would start later and last longer, plus the world would probably take longer to heal. And yes perfumes and shampoos are as deadly a weapon as any. But nothing is scarier that press-on nails and weaves. Press-ons can reach almost any length and cut through anything. And don't ever pull out a woman's weave. That's like calling a black guy the n word.

[Justin]

I think women should control all things political, anyway. Women intelligent enough to hold high positions of political power are generally peaceful, for the most part, anyway.

-Justin

[BabyGirl]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by shadowdramon [/i]
[B] And don't ever pull out a woman's weave. That's like calling a black guy the n word. [/B][/QUOTE]

[color=deeppink]:rotflmao: Heh, some of these posts are hilarious (in a good way!) ^_^;

And I just want to point out that I'm merely playing devil's advocate here...I'm not trying to argue for or against anyone's opinions...yet.

Though I [i]have[/i] read quite a few posts that say that the wars would be of the backstabbing sort...because all women are petty with their arguments against one another? Isn't that making a rather large assumption about women?

I, for one, don't hold long grudges. I don't take part in b[i][/i]itch fights, I don't get [b]mad[/b] over stupid thing, and I know a lot of girls who are the same as I. Don't make it sound like ALL women solve things by talking **** about each other...because we don't :p [/color]

[Mist]

[color=red][size=1]She's right. I struggle to hold grudges, and don't take part in the "best friend vs.bestfriend" fights, that usually end at the end of the time. There's more to life than worrying about who b****in at who.[/color][/size]

[Krillen]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Char! [/i]
[B]

[color=teal][size=1]Justin, did you forget?[/color][/size]



[color=teal][size=1]I think the question is null. No offense.


--Mike[/color][/size]

[size=1][color=red]If you can't participate in a small, fun topic, then, by all means, get out of it. Don't ruin it for everyone else who [i]has[/i] a sense of fun.

-Justin[/color][/size] [/B][/QUOTE]

For once I will agree with Justin...Char, just stop it, your digging a deeper whole......If that is indeed your theory, then just forget baout it and make believe with us here.

[James]

[color=royalblue]If only women existed, we'd still have war...but it would probably be very different. And much less frequent.

Women [i]can[/i] reproduce without men, by way of embryonic cloning (even though it's pretty much illegal)...but yeah, it's not like that's impossible. lol

It's actually men who can't live without women...so it's the other way around. Men can't give birth. lol

Anyway, that aside...I think a lot of things would be different without men. And I think the world would probably be a better place. lol[/color]

[Juu]

Well, one 'war' issue would be that we wouldn't be killing each other for the cute guy in the second row. ^_-

but I think it wouldn't be any fun....
1. No flirting T.T -heh... *cough* unless you're a lez... o.o'
2. No 'girls only' clubs...... O.o
3. No FLIRTING!!! oh wait... did I already say that?
-------------------

ahem, anyways, It would be a lil more peaceful.... ^_^

[Chaos]

Of course there would be war! Women are human too, and have human emotions (The last time I checked, that is). If anything, women are more emotional then men. So yeah. War would still be accouring. Probably moreso than today. I mean, I've seen fights over clothes that had to be broken up by about a dozen of those Rent-A-Cops. So imagine if Russia and American leaders went shopping together.

Eee... Nuclear war!

"It's MY sweater!!"

"No, it's MINE!!"

*large explosion*

"YOU *****!!! YOU BLEW UP 5th AVENUE!!"

[Sara]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by BabyGirl [/i]
[B]

[color=deeppink]Isn't that making a rather large assumption about women? [/color] [/B][/QUOTE]A gross generalization, but one that fits the arguement. I could just as easily go the other way.... but, too tired. Maybe later, eh?

[Defcon5]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by James [/i]
[B][color=royalblue]If only women existed, we'd still have war...but it would probably be very different. And much less frequent.

Women [i]can[/i] reproduce without men, by way of embryonic cloning (even though it's pretty much illegal)...but yeah, it's not like that's impossible. lol

It's actually men who can't live without women...so it's the other way around. Men can't give birth. lol

Anyway, that aside...I think a lot of things would be different without men. And I think the world would probably be a better place. lol[/color] [/B][/QUOTE]

Your not serious...are you? lol. But wouldn't they need a Male sperm?

[Jesus Chicken]

I think there would be conflicts and wars, but once a month there would be a civil war in every country... figure it out. There would be alot more cooking shows and such compared to footy on friday nights. Everything would change and alot of history and differrent opinions would be lost. There would be many things forfiet due to such a strange predicament. Oh well I doubt we will ever see such a place.

[Chaos]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Defcon5 [/i]
[B]

Your not serious...are you? lol. But wouldn't they need a Male sperm? [/B][/QUOTE]


Not really. Genetic cloning recreates a person. Just change a few variables, give the chick a shot, and boom. Male sperm isn't truly needed, but it saves a lot of time/money than making artificial semen.

[Defcon5]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by SuperSayian [/i]
[B]


Not really. Genetic cloning recreates a person. Just change a few variables, give the chick a shot, and boom. Male sperm isn't truly needed, but it saves a lot of time/money than making artificial semen. [/B][/QUOTE]

:eek: Damnit! I must go and destroy the recipe for artifical sperm before [I]they[/I] wipe us out. And I think James is one of them he thinks the world would be better with out men! Ahhhhhh!

[Juu]

hmm..... :evil grin:

Not a bad idea.... :smirk:

[Mist]

[color=red][size=1] Hmmm...we should consider that...Nah...no fun then...[/color][/size]

[Mitch]

[color=red]Of course their would be wars!! Women can also be very aggresive(sometimes more) than males. I am sure their would be peace in the world for awhile. But, conflict is always going to happen and will. Sounds kind of like The Chaos Theory, right? So yes, eventually their would be war. I am certain. [/color]

[zidane11]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Mist [/i]
[B]

[color=red][size=1]My, my, don't we have a one track mind? Of course there could be wars without men! It could be a little less physical, more like a nuclear war, or it could be even more brutal combat. Just because we don't have guys in wars doesn't mean that there could never be a war.

*EDIT* If you had read the whole thread, we were pretending that women were asexual.[/color][/size] [/B][/QUOTE]

I didn't say you couldn't have wars without men. I meant that men wouldn't say that women can't fight.

*Note: I was in a hurry.;)

[Char!]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by Krillen [/i]
[B]For once I will agree with Justin...Char, just stop it, your digging a deeper whole......If that is indeed your theory, then just forget baout it and make believe with us here. [/B][/QUOTE]
[color=teal][size=1]Hey, I didn't want to start anything here. But why not throw a few twists in? I just wanted to make sure of all the facts and stuff.[/color][/size]

[QUOTE][i]Originally posted by PiroMunkie [/i]
[B][color=indigo]Meh, perhaps a better solution to the reproduction dilemma is that women eradicated men from this planet and they merely use, and clone, the semen from sperm banks where female scientists tamper with the chromosomes to make sure only an X chromosome is sent over. That defies no laws of nature what-so-ever. :p[/color] [/B][/QUOTE]
[color=teal][size=1]Hey, I'll definitely go along with that...:smirk:

Let's see. There would most likely be wars here, and of the same nature. For the same reasons, and with the same number of casualties. I mean, eventually everything will sort itself out in the end and everything would be the same as it is now. Except, of course, for that obvious fact of no one to kill spiders.

I didn't mean that in a sexist way, so let's not go jumpin' around again, anybody.


--Mike[/color][/size]

[Kent]

yea, there would still be wars but they would be different. i dont think raw combat battles would occur as much. it would all be clinton style, lobbing missiles from long range. of course maybe the women would also think of a way to end all the wars, girls have amazing persuasion (sp?) abilities.